Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242298›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2018

A 29-gene and cytogenetic score for the prediction of resistance to induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia.

Tobias Herold, Vindi Jurinovic, Aarif M N Batcha, Stefanos A Bamopoulos, Maja Rothenberg-Thurley, Bianka Ksienzyk, Luise Hartmann, Philipp A Greif, Julia Phillippou-Massier, Stefan Krebs and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of SLC22A4 in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Tobias HeroldDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany tobias.herold@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Vindi JurinovicInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Germany.
Aarif M N BatchaGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanos A BamopoulosDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Maja Rothenberg-ThurleyDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Bianka KsienzykDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Luise HartmannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Philipp A GreifDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Julia Phillippou-MassierInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Germany
Stefan KrebsInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Germany
Helmut BlumInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Germany
Susanne AmlerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephanie SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Nikola KonstandinDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Maria Cristina SauerlandInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Munich, Germany.
Dennis GörlichInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang E BerdelDepartment of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany.
Bernhard J WörmannGerman Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna TischerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Marion SubkleweDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Stefan K BohlanderDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jan BraessDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HiddemannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Klaus H MetzelerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.
Ulrich MansmannGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
Karsten SpiekermannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary therapy resistance is a major problem in acute myeloid leukemia treatment. We set out to develop a powerful and robust predictor for therapy resistance for intensively treated adult patients. We used two large gene expression data sets (n=856) to develop a predictor of therapy resistance, which was validated in an independent cohort analyzed by RNA sequencing (n=250). In addition to gene expression markers, standard clinical and laboratory variables as well as the mutation status of 68 genes were considered during construction of the model. The final predictor (PS29MRC) consisted of 29 gene expression markers and a cytogenetic risk classification. A continuous predictor is calculated as a weighted linear sum of the individual variables. In addition, a cut off was defined to divide patients into a high-risk and a low-risk group for resistant disease. PS29MRC was highly significant in the validation set, both as a continuous score (OR=2.39,

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMutationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29242298
PMCPMC5830382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.