Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242283›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2018

Phase II Study of BEZ235 versus Everolimus in Patients with Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor-Naïve Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Ramon Salazar, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero, Steven K Libutti, Andrew E Hendifar, Ana Custodio, Rosine Guimbaud, Catherine Lombard-Bohas, Sergio Ricci, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Jaume Capdevila and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 17 institutions in 6 countries.

Ramon SalazarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia-IDIBELL-CIBERONC, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ramonsalazarsole@iconcologia.net.
Rocio Garcia-CarboneroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Steven K LibuttiAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Andrew E HendifarDavid Geffen School of Medicine and Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ana CustodioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Rosine GuimbaudDepartment of Digestive Medical Oncology (IUCT-RL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Catherine Lombard-BohasCentre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Sergio RicciDivision of Medical Oncology, S Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Heinz-Josef KlümpenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaume CapdevilaVall Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Nicholas ReedBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland.
Annemiek WalenkampUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Enrique GrandeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Sufiya SafinaDepartment of Biochemistry, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Tim MeyerRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver KongNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Herve SalomonNovartis Pharma S.A.S., Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Ranjana TavorathNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
James C YaoThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Novartis (United States) · USAcademic Medical Center · NLAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESHôpital Lyon Sud · FRHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESKazan State Medical University · RUNovartis (France) · FRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

Project 4: New Approaches to Improving the Effectiveness of Radionuclide Targeted Treatments in Neuroendocrine TumorsP50CA174521 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ODORISIO, THOMAS · 2015 to 2021
$13.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA174521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedTreatment with BEZ235 has not been shown to demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile.The hypothesis of dual targeting of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may warrant further study using other agents.

backgroundThis phase II study investigated whether targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway via PI3K, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) inhibition using BEZ235 may be more effective than mTORC1 inhibition with everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) who are naïve to mTOR inhibitor therapy.

methodsPatients with advanced pNET were randomized (1:1) to oral BEZ235 400 mg twice daily or oral everolimus 10 mg once daily on a continuous dosing schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure.

resultsEnrollment in this study was terminated early (62 enrolled of the 140 planned). The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3 to not evaluable [NE]) with BEZ235 versus 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.1-NE) with everolimus (hazard ratio 1.53; 95% CI: 0.72-3.25). The most commonly reported all-grade adverse events (>50% of patients regardless of study treatment relationship) with BEZ235 were diarrhea (90.3%), stomatitis (74.2%), and nausea (54.8%).

conclusionBEZ235 treatment in mTOR inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced pNET did not demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsEverolimusFemaleHumansImidazolesMaleMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Middle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProgression-Free SurvivalQuinolinesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsdactolisibEverolimusImidazolesMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2MTOR protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsQuinolinesTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID29242283
PMCPMC6058330
OpenAlexW2771377667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.