Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242268›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2018

Preterm Birth, Poverty, and Cognitive Development.

Jennifer L Beauregard, Carolyn Drews-Botsch, Jessica M Sales, W Dana Flanders, Michael R Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. aEEG in the first 3 days after extremely preterm delivery relates to neurodevelopmental outcomes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Preterm birth and early life environmental factors: neuropsychological profiles at adolescence and young adulthood.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer L BeauregardDepartments of Epidemiology and jen@ciaobeau.com.
Carolyn Drews-BotschDepartments of Epidemiology and.
Jessica M SalesBehavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
W Dana FlandersDepartments of Epidemiology and.
Michael R KramerDepartments of Epidemiology and.

Funding

Training in Reproductive, Perinatal, Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052460 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DREWS-BOTSCH, CAROLYN DAWSON · 2006 to 2015
$2.2M
Geography of opportunity: Neighborhood dynamics and child cognitive developmentK01HD074726 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KRAMER, MICHAEL ROOT · 2013 to 2017
$596k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD074726NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth and childhood poverty each adversely impact children's cognitive development and academic outcomes. In this study, we investigated whether the relationships between preterm and early term birth and children's cognitive scores at 3, 5, and 7 years old were modified by childhood poverty.

methodsThis study was conducted by using data on singletons born at 24 to 40 weeks' gestation enrolled in the Millennium Cohort Study in the United Kingdom. Linear regression models were used to test independent and joint associations of gestational age (early or moderate preterm, late preterm, or early term compared with term) and childhood poverty (<60% of median UK income) with children's cognitive scores. Presence of additive interaction between gestational age and poverty was tested by using interaction terms.

resultsChildren born preterm (<37 weeks) or early term (37-38 weeks) tended to score more poorly on cognitive assessments than children born at term (39-40 weeks). The estimated deficits were ∼0.2 to 0.3 SD for early or moderate preterm, 0.1 SD for late preterm, and 0.05 SD for early term compared with term. Children living in poverty scored 0.3 to 0.4 SD worse than children not living in poverty on all assessments. For most assessments, the estimated effects of the 2 factors were approximately additive, with little or no evidence of interaction between gestational age and poverty.

conclusionsAlthough children born preterm who lived in poverty had the poorest cognitive outcomes, living in poverty did not magnify the adverse effect of being preterm on cognitive development.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCognitionCognition DisordersCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsFemaleGestational AgeHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePoverty

Identifiers

PMID29242268
PMCPMC5744274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.