ReviewCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2017
Defining Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Review in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04475094 (Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 2020 SCCT Guideline for Training Cardiology and Radiology Trainees as Independent Practitioners (Level II) and Advanced Practitioners (Level III) in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: A Statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyGuideline
- Noninvasive and simple, but accurate? Meta-analysis of evidence-based point-of-care ultrasound for assessing dehydration in children.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023Article
- A cardiovascular risk model validated in Japan applied to an Italian cohort: Procedere con prudenza.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- ASNC Image Guide Registry: Leading the way toward improving quality and patient care in nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2021Article
- 2020 SCCT Guideline for Training Cardiology and Radiology Trainees as Independent Practitioners (Level II) and Advanced Practitioners (Level III) in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: A Statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2021Article
- The quest to improve sudden cardiac death prediction using sympathetic innervation scintigraphy: Chasing a mirage?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Myocardial blood flow reserve assessed by positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging identifies patients with a survival benefit from early revascularization.European heart journal · 2020Article
- Challenges and opportunities for nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Is there a role for imaging heart teams? Looking forward together!Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease with SPECT and PET.Current cardiology reports · 2019Review
- What does the future hold for nuclear cardiology?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- When Can We Defer Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain?JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aims of the current statement are to refine the definition of quality in cardiovascular imaging and to propose novel methodological approaches to inform the demonstration of quality in imaging in future clinical trials and registries. We propose defining quality in cardiovascular imaging using an analytical framework put forth by the Institute of Medicine whereby quality was defined as testing being safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, equitable, and efficient. The implications of each of these components of quality health care are as essential for cardiovascular imaging as they are for other areas within health care. Our proposed statement may serve as the foundation for integrating these quality indicators into establishing designations of quality laboratory practices and developing standards for value-based payment reform for imaging services. We also include recommendations for future clinical research to fulfill quality aims within cardiovascular imaging, including clinical hypotheses of improving patient outcomes, the importance of health status as an end point, and deferred testing options. Future research should evolve to define novel methods optimized for the role of cardiovascular imaging for detecting disease and guiding treatment and to demonstrate the role of cardiovascular imaging in facilitating healthcare quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.