Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242014›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2018

Anti-IgE treatment with oral immunotherapy in multifood allergic participants: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

Sandra Andorf, Natasha Purington, Whitney M Block, Andrew J Long, Dana Tupa, Erica Brittain, Amanda Rudman Spergel, Manisha Desai, Stephen J Galli, Kari C Nadeau and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02643862 (Randomized, Controlled, Blinded, Pilot Study Using Xolair in Rush Multi Oral Immunotherapy in Multi Food Allergic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 112 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02643862 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Randomized, Controlled, Blinded, Pilot Study Using Xolair in Rush Multi Oral Immunotherapy in Multi Food Allergic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled48ConditionsFood AllergyArmsXolair, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. HLA-DRAllergy · 2025
    Trial
  6. Omalizumab for the Treatment of Multiple Food Allergies.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Trial
  7. Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Responses in a Longitudinal, Randomized Trial of Peanut Oral Immunotherapy.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Allergy to Cats: Current Perspectives and Therapeutic Options.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Wheat allergy, a new and emerging threat of food allergy for children.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Using Biologics in the Prevention of Anaphylaxis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  20. The Expanding Role of Omalizumab: From Food Allergy to Drug Desensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra AndorfSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Natasha PuringtonSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Whitney M BlockSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Andrew J LongSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dana TupaSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Erica BrittainNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Amanda Rudman SpergelNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Manisha DesaiSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stephen J GalliSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Departments of Pathology and of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kari C NadeauSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
R Sharon ChinthrajahSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: schinths@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Tracking allergen specific T cells in multi-food allergyU19AI104209 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GALLI, STEPHEN JOSEPH · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI104209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite progress in single food oral immunotherapy, there is little evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of treating individuals with multiple food (multifood) allergies. We did a pilot study testing whether anti-IgE (omalizumab) combined with multifood oral immunotherapy benefited multifood allergic patients.

methodsWe did a blinded, phase 2 clinical trial at Stanford University. We enrolled participants, aged 4-15 years, with multifood allergies validated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges to their offending foods. Inclusion criteria included a positive skin prick test of 6 mm or more (wheal diameter, above the negative control), a food-specific serum IgE concentration of more than 4 kU/L for each food, or both, and a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at 500 mg or less of food protein. Exclusion criteria included eosinophilic oesophagitis and severe asthma. Participants were randomised (3:1) with a block size of four, to receive multifood oral immunotherapy to two to five foods, together with omalizumab (n=36) or placebo (n=12). 12 individuals who fulfilled the same inclusion and exclusion criteria were included as controls. These individuals were not randomised and received neither omalizumab nor oral immunotherapy. Omalizumab or placebo was administered subcutaneously for 16 weeks, with oral immunotherapy starting at week 8, and was stopped 20 weeks before the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at week 36. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who passed double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges to at least two of their offending foods. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02643862.

findingsBetween March 25, 2015, and Aug 18, 2016, 165 participants were assessed for eligibility, of whom 84 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 21 declined to participate. We enrolled and randomised 48 eligible participants and the remaining 12 patients were included as nonrandomised, untreated controls. At week 36, a significantly greater proportion of the omalizumab-treated (30 [83%] of 36) versus placebo (four [33%] of 12) participants passed double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges to 2 g protein for two or more of their offending foods (odds ratio 10·0, 95% CI 1·8-58·3, p=0·0044). All participants completed the study. There were no serious or severe (grade 3 or worse) adverse events. Participants in the omalizumab group had a significantly lower median per-participant percentage of oral immunotherapy doses associated with any adverse events (27% vs 68%; p=0·0082). The most common adverse events in both groups were gastrointestinal events.

interpretationIn multifood allergic patients, omalizumab improves the efficacy of multifood oral immunotherapy and enables safe and rapid desensitisation.

fundingUS National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Allergic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyDesensitization, ImmunologicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFood HypersensitivityHumansImmunoglobulin EMaleOmalizumabPilot ProjectsAnti-Allergic AgentsImmunoglobulin EOmalizumab

Identifiers

PMID29242014
PMCPMC6944204
OpenAlexW2774253900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.