ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2018
Nativity Disparities in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among U.S. Adults.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Drivers of human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in migrant populations and interventions to improve coverage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Public health · 2025Pooled it
- Vaccine hesitancy in the refugee, immigrant, and migrant population in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Factors Affecting Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Men: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Pooled it
- Missed Opportunities in Head and Neck Cancer Prevention: Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Messaging in MENA-Serving Health Systems.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- The Impact of a Human Papillomavirus Facebook-Based Intervention (#HPVVaxTalks) Among Young Black (African American and Sub-Saharan African Immigrants) Adults: Pilot Pre- and Poststudy.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Nativity and racial/ethnic differences in HPV infection among U.S. adults, NHANES 2007-2016.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Barriers to and Facilitators for Accessing HPV Vaccination in Migrant and Refugee Populations: A Systematic Review.Vaccines · 2024Review
- HPV vaccine delay and refusal among unvaccinated Mexican American young adult women: a qualitative investigation of Mexican-born and US-born HPV vaccine decision narratives.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Predictors of Vaccine Uptake among Migrants in the United States: A Rapid Systematic Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- HPV vaccination uptake among foreign-born Blacks in the US: insights from the National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
- Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Pap Smear Rates Among Burmese Refugee Girls in a Healthcare System in Omaha, Nebraska.Journal of community health · 2021Article
- Brazilian Immigrant Parents' Awareness of HPV and the HPV Vaccine and Interest in Participating in Future HPV-Related Cancer Prevention Study: an Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in the USA.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2020Article
- Differences in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake by nativity status among men aged 18-34 years.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- Nativity status and genital HPV infection among adults in the U.S.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Article
- Non-Adherence To Childhood HPV Vaccination Is Associated With Non-Participation In Cervical Cancer ScreeningClinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- Missed Opportunities for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination by Parental Nativity, Minnesota, 2015-2018.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSeveral studies have identified disparities in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related outcomes by nativity status (i.e., U.S.- versus foreign-born). However, few studies have explored whether vaccination differences exist by nativity status. Vaccination disparities have the potential to exacerbate HPV-related cancer disparities in the long term if left unaddressed. Therefore, the authors investigated whether there were significant differences in HPV vaccination initiation (one or more doses) and completion (three or more doses) between U.S.-born and foreign-born men and women.
methodsUsing the 2011 to 2015 waves of the National Health Interview Survey, data from 15,967 U.S. men aged 18-32 years and 23,794 U.S. women aged 18-35 years were analyzed in February 2017. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to determine whether nativity status predicted (1) HPV vaccination initiation and (2) HPV vaccination completion separately among men and women after adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare factors.
resultsCompared with those born in the U.S., foreign-born men and women had lower prevalence of HPV vaccine initiation and completion. Furthermore, after controlling for covariates, foreign-born men (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.47, 0.85) and women (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.49, 0.66) had significantly lower adjusted odds of HPV vaccination initiation compared with their U.S.-born counterparts. Additionally, foreign-born women had significantly lower adjusted odds of HPV vaccination completion (OR=0.56, 95% CI=0.46, 0.69).
conclusionsThe demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare factors included in this study did not appear to account fully for observed disparities. Future research is needed to understand other factors that may contribute to nativity status disparities in HPV vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.