Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29241252›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2017

Residents' Insights and Ideas about Screen-Sharing in Primary Care Clinics.

Kathlyn E Fletcher, Onur Asan, Jeanne Tyszka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathlyn E FletcherDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin and the Milwaukee VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Onur AsanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin and the Milwaukee VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Jeanne TyszkaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin and the Milwaukee VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.

Funding

Clincal and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000055 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$11.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Previous studies described attending physicians' perceptions of the benefits and downsides of having the electronic health record (EHR) in the room during a clinical encounter. The perspective of residents has received little attention. Objective The goal of this project was to solicit internal medicine residents' perception of EHR use in primary care clinic visits. In this report, we focus on residents' perception of screen-sharing. Methods We conducted qualitative, semistructured interviews of internal medicine residents. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed, and anonymized. Using a deductive approach to data analysis, we coded the transcripts to identify themes of interest. Results We included 21 residents. We identified eight themes related to screen-sharing. We identified opportunities, facilitators and barriers, and outcomes related to screen-sharing. We conceptualized the outcomes, facilitators, and barriers as falling into four categories: structural, patient based, physician based, and interactional. Conclusion Wider dissemination and adoption of curricula designed to teach residents how to incorporate EHR into the clinical encounter is needed. In addition, our study demonstrates the need to focus this training, at least in part, on screen-sharing and management of sensitive information disclosure.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyMalePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29241252
PMCPMC5802306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.