ArticleApplied clinical informatics2017
Providing Patients with Implantable Cardiac Device Data through a Personal Health Record: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient experiences of continuous glucose monitoring and sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies.Journal of diabetes · 2023Pooled it
- Functions and Outcomes of Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2021Pooled it
- What Do Patients and Caregivers Want? A Systematic Review of User Suggestions to Improve Patient Portals.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Pooled it
- Recommendations for sharing cardiovascular implantable electronic device data with patients based on clinician interviews.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Coronary artery patient's empowerment through a user-centered design of an electronic personal health record: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Article
- Recommendations for the Quality Management of Patient-Generated Health Data in Remote Patient Monitoring: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Clinician use of data elements from cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in clinical practice.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2023Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hospital Discharged COVID-19 Patients.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Patients' and Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators in Heart Failure: Cross-Sectional, Descriptive, Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Untold Stories in User-Centered Design of Mobile Health: Practical Challenges and Strategies Learned From the Design and Evaluation of an App for Older Adults With Heart Failure.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Involving patients as key stakeholders in the design of cardiovascular implantable electronic device data dashboards: Implications for patient care.Heart rhythm O2 · 2020Article
- Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Data Integration and Interoperability for Patient-Centered Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Patient responses to daily cardiac resynchronization therapy device data: A pilot trial assessing a novel patient-centered digital dashboard in everyday life.Cardiovascular digital health journalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.