Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29240833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Vagal nerve stimulation triggers widespread responses and alters large-scale functional connectivity in the rat brain.

Jiayue Cao, Kun-Han Lu, Terry L Powley, Zhongming Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Interoception network in the rat brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Peripheral CB1 receptor blockade acts as a memory enhancer through a noradrenergic mechanism.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiayue CaoWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Kun-Han LuPurdue Institute of Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Terry L PowleyWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Zhongming LiuWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-4204
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

HYPOTHALAMIC CONTROL OF BODY WEIGHT AND FEEDINGR01DK027627 · NIDDK · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI POWLEY, TERRY L. · 1986 to 2021
$6.1M
Multimodal Hyperspectral Imaging of Brain Activity and ConnectivityR01MH104402 · NIMH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, ZHONGMING · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK027627NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a therapy for epilepsy and depression. However, its efficacy varies and its mechanism remains unclear. Prior studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to map brain activations with VNS in human brains, but have reported inconsistent findings. The source of inconsistency is likely attributable to the complex temporal characteristics of VNS-evoked fMRI responses that cannot be fully explained by simplified response models in the conventional model-based analysis for activation mapping. To address this issue, we acquired 7-Tesla blood oxygenation level dependent fMRI data from anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats receiving electrical stimulation at the left cervical vagus nerve. Using spatially independent component analysis, we identified 20 functional brain networks and detected the network-wise activations with VNS in a data-driven manner. Our results showed that VNS activated 15 out of 20 brain networks, and the activated regions covered >76% of the brain volume. The time course of the evoked response was complex and distinct across regions and networks. In addition, VNS altered the strengths and patterns of correlations among brain networks relative to those in the resting state. The most notable changes in network-network interactions were related to the limbic system. Together, such profound and widespread effects of VNS may underlie its unique potential for a wide range of therapeutics to relieve central or peripheral conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, BiologicalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVagus Nerve Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29240833
PMCPMC5730194
OpenAlexW2952903119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.