ArticlePloS one2017
Genetic dissection of main and epistatic effects of QTL based on augmented triple test cross design.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of heterosis has considerably increased the productivity of many crops; however, the biological mechanism underpinning the technique remains elusive. The North Carolina design III (NCIII) and the triple test cross (TTC) are powerful and popular genetic mating design that can be used to decipher the genetic basis of heterosis. However, when using the NCIII design with the present quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping method, if epistasis exists, the estimated additive or dominant effects are confounded with epistatic effects. Here, we propose a two-step approach to dissect all genetic effects of QTL and digenic interactions on a whole genome without sacrificing statistical power based on an augmented TTC (aTTC) design. Because the aTTC design has more transformation combinations than do the NCIII and TTC designs, it greatly enriches the QTL mapping for studying heterosis. When the basic population comprises recombinant inbred lines (RIL), we can use the same materials in the NCIII design for aTTC-design QTL mapping with transformation combination Z1, Z2, and Z4 to obtain genetic effect of QTL and digenic interactions. Compared with RIL-based TTC design, RIL-based aTTC design saves time, money, and labor for basic population crossed with F1. Several Monte Carlo simulation studies were carried out to confirm the proposed approach; the present genetic parameters could be identified with high statistical power, precision, and calculation speed, even at small sample size or low heritability. Additionally, two elite rice hybrid datasets for nine agronomic traits were estimated for real data analysis. We dissected the genetic effects and calculated the dominance degree of each QTL and digenic interaction. Real mapping results suggested that the dominance degree in Z2 that mainly characterize heterosis showed overdominance and dominance for QTL and digenic interactions. Dominance and overdominance were the major genetic foundations of heterosis in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.