Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29240785›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

DEET as a feeding deterrent.

WeiYu Lu, Justin K Hwang, Fangfang Zeng, Walter S Leal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

WeiYu LuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Justin K HwangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Fangfang ZengDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Walter S LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-1240
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Olfactory protein-based screening of oviposition attractants for Culex mosquitoesR01AI095514 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEAL, WALTER S · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
Is Culex quinquefasciatus a vector of the Zika virus?R21AI128931 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEAL, WALTER S · 2016 to 2017
$392k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095514NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insect repellent N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET), is a multimodal compound that acts as a spatial repellent as well as an irritant (contact repellent), thus being perceived by the insect's olfactory and gustatory systems as an odorant and a tastant, respectively. Soon after DEET was developed, almost 6 decades ago, it was reported that it reduced mosquito feeding on blood mixed with this repellent. It is now known that the mosquito proboscis senses contact repellents with the tips (labella) of the labium, which remain in direct contact with the outer layers of the skin, while the stylets, including the feeding deterrent sensor (labrum), penetrate the skin. We designed a behavioral assay that allowed us to measure feeding deterrence without complications from contact or spatial repellency. Using the southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, we demonstrate here that when DEET was mixed with blood and covered by Parafilm® layers, the mean number of landings and duration of contacts with surfaces covering blood mixed with DEET or blood plus solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) did not differ significantly thus implying that DEET did not leak to the outer surface. The feeding times, however, were significantly different. When blood was mixed either with 0.1 or 1% DEET, female southern house mosquitoes spent significantly (P<0.0001) less time feeding than the time spent feeding on blood mixed only with the solvent. By contrast, significant differences in the mean times of feeding on blood containing 1% picaridin and blood plus solvent were significant at 5%, but not at 1% level. Like DEET, the contact repellent and insecticide, permethrin, caused a significant (P<0.0001) reduction in feeding time. We, therefore, concluded, that in this context, DEET, permethrin, and, to a lesser extent, picaridin, act as feeding deterrents.

Indexed as

AnimalsCulexDEETFeeding BehaviorInsect RepellentsDEETInsect Repellents

Identifiers

PMID29240785
PMCPMC5730186
OpenAlexW2949935289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.