Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29240670›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Well-Being and Associated Factors among Women in the Gender-Segregated Country.

Hoda Jradi, Oraynab Abouabbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hoda JradiCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, Mail Code 2350, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia. Hoda.Jradi@gmail.com.
Oraynab AbouabbasKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Office of Population Health, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia. Abouabbasor@ngha.med.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-being is an essential measure that contributes to the evaluation of the health and quality of life of populations. In 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined health as physical, mental and social well-being. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between July and September 2015. Women aged 18 years old and above were invited to participate in the study. The data were collected using the WHO's Well-Being Index questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors that are significantly associated with well-being. A total of 900 women completed the survey. Approximately 58% of the women reported moderate to high (≥50) score of well-being, whereas 41.7% reported ill-being/likely depression. Experiencing violence, living in unfavorable physical conditions and reporting morbidities were shown to be significantly associated with low levels of subjective well-being (ill-being) (

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSocial SegregationSurveys and QuestionnairesViolenceYoung Adultmental healthSaudi Arabiawell-beingWHO-5 well-being indexwomen

Identifiers

PMID29240670
PMCPMC5750991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.