Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29239943›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2018

Achieving Milestones as a Prerequisite for Proceeding With a Clinical Trial.

Angela M Mickle, Hannah R Maybrier, Anke C Winter, Sherry L McKinnon, Brian A Torres, Nan Lin, Eric J Lenze, Susan Stark, Maxwell R Muench, Eric Jacobsohn and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela M MickleFrom the Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Hannah R Maybrier
Anke C Winter
Sherry L McKinnon
Brian A Torres
Nan Lin
Eric J Lenze
Susan Stark
Maxwell R Muench
Eric Jacobsohn
Sharon K Inouye
Michael S Avidan
Troy S Wildes
ENGAGES Research Group*
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPH GUIDANCE OF ANESTHESIA TO ALLEVIATE GERIATRIC SYNDROMES (ENGAGES)UH3AG050312 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AVIDAN, MICHAEL SIMON · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
Electroencephalograph Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENUH2AG050312 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AVIDAN, MICHAEL SIMON · 2014 to 2014
$483k
NIA NIH HHS UH2 AG050312NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG050312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the National Institutes of Health (NIH) invests $30 billion in research annually, many funded studies fail to generate results that can inform practice. The National Institutes of Health introduced a phased funding mechanism as one potential solution. Study-specific milestones are established for an initial pilot phase. We assess the utility of this phased approach through the ongoing Electroencephalography (EEG) Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENGAGES) pragmatic clinical trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that EEG guidance of general anesthesia, through prevention of EEG suppression, can decrease postoperative delirium and its downstream negative sequelae.

methodsIn collaboration with study stakeholders, we identified critical milestones for the ENGAGES study, with themes common to many clinical trials. These themes include: regulatory tasks; enrollment targets; feasibility and impact of study intervention; primary outcome incidence; measurement reliability of primary outcome; and follow-up. Progress in achieving the milestones was assessed at regular intervals during the pilot phase by ENGAGES investigators, a National Institute on Aging program officer, and a nonpartisan research organization (Westat).

resultsRegulatory tasks, including institutional review board approval, infrastructure establishment, and trial registration, were completed on schedule. A total of 117 patients were randomized, exceeding the target by 51. The EEG-guided protocol was successfully implemented, and a relevant effect on anesthetic practice was demonstrated (decrease in median age-adjusted minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration from 0.93 to 0.78 [P < .001] and increase in median proportion of zero EEG suppression time from 87% to 94% [P < .01]). Nearly all patients (115 of 117, 98.3%) were assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method, and the delirium incidence was similar (28.1%; 95% CI, 20%-37%) to the estimate (25%) used for the sample size calculation. Good interrater reliability of delirium assessment was demonstrated (κ = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.86-1]). Finally, 1-month follow-up vital status data were obtained for 96.9% of patients, with 85.7% of patients completing at least 1 survey.

conclusionsWith the ENGAGES trial, we demonstrated that key milestones can be identified and progressively assessed during a pilot phase. Success in attaining appropriate milestones hypothetically predicts meaningful completion of a study, and can provide justification for proceeding beyond a pilot phase. The impact of this phased approach on return on investment and scientific yield requires additional study.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAnesthesiaClinical ProtocolsElectroencephalographyGeriatricsHumansPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29239943
PMCPMC5953758
OpenAlexW2772621573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.