Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29239335›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2017

Saponins from

Li-Li Deng, Ding Yuan, Zhi-Yong Zhou, Jing-Zhi Wan, Chang-Cheng Zhang, Chao-Qi Liu, Yao-Yan Dun, Hai-Xia Zhao, Bo Zhao, Yuan-Jian Yang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Total saponins fromJournal of ginseng research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Saponins fromPharmaceutical biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Saponins fromPharmaceutical biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Saponins fromJournal of ginseng research · 2021
    Article
  12. Effects of the fermentedNutrition research and practice · 2021
    Article
  13. Distinct expression patterns of aging effects on the UPRInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Li DengCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province; Renhe Hospital, Second College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Ding YuanRenhe Hospital, Second College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Zhi-Yong ZhouCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Jing-Zhi WanRenhe Hospital, Second College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Chang-Cheng ZhangCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Chao-Qi LiuCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Yao-Yan DunCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Hai-Xia ZhaoCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Bo ZhaoCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
Yuan-Jian YangMedical Experimental Center, Jiangxi Mental Hospital/Affiliated Mental Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Ting WangCollege of Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China.
China Three Gorges University · CNJiangxi Mental Health Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroinflammation is recognized as an important pathogenic factor for aging and related cognitive disorders. Mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathways may mediate neuroinflammation. Saponins from Panax japonicus are the most abundant and bioactive members in rhizomes of Panax japonicus, and show anti-inflammatory activity. However, it is not known whether saponin from Panax japonicus has an anti-inflammatory effect in the aging brain, and likewise its underlying mechanisms. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into control groups (3-, 9-, 15-, and 24-month-old groups) and saponins from Panax japonicus-treated groups. Saponins from Panax japonicus-treated groups were orally administrated saponins from Panax japonicus at three doses of 10, 30, and 60 mg/kg once daily for 6 months until the rats were 24 months old. Immunohistochemical staining and western blot assay results demonstrated that many microglia were activated in 24-month-old rats compared with 3- and 9-month-old rats. Expression of interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, cyclooxygenase-2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase increased. Each dose of saponins from Panax japonicus visibly suppressed microglial activation in the aging rat brain, and inhibited expression levels of the above factors. Each dose of saponins from Panax japonicus markedly diminished levels of nuclear factor kappa B, IκBα, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and p38. These results confirm that saponins from Panax japonicus can mitigate neuroinflammation in the aging rat brain by inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathways.

Indexed as

agingc-Jun N-terminal kinaseextracellular signal-regulated kinaseinflammatory factormicrogliamitogen-activated protein kinasenerve regenerationneural regenerationneuroinflammationnuclear factor kappa Bp38saponins from Panax japonicus

Identifiers

PMID29239335
PMCPMC5745843
OpenAlexW2770101694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.