Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29239063›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Stimulating neural plasticity with real-time fMRI neurofeedback in Huntington's disease: A proof of concept study.

Marina Papoutsi, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Douglas Langbehn, Ralf Reilmann, Geraint Rees, Sarah J Tabrizi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Interventions for Neural Plasticity in Stroke Recovery.Archives of internal medicine research · 2025
    Article
  9. Closed-loop fMRI at the mesoscopic scale of columns and layers: Can we do it and why would we want to?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marina PapoutsiUCL Huntington's Disease Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nikolaus WeiskopfMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Douglas LangbehnCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ralf ReilmannGeorge Huntington Institute and Department of Radiology, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Geraint ReesWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah J TabriziUCL Huntington's Disease Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-8361
Huntington's Disease Association · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L012936/1Medical Research Council MR/L02053X/1Wellcome Trust 200181/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel methods that stimulate neuroplasticity are increasingly being studied to treat neurological and psychiatric conditions. We sought to determine whether real-time fMRI neurofeedback training is feasible in Huntington's disease (HD), and assess any factors that contribute to its effectiveness. In this proof-of-concept study, we used this technique to train 10 patients with HD to volitionally regulate the activity of their supplementary motor area (SMA). We collected detailed behavioral and neuroimaging data before and after training to examine changes of brain function and structure, and cognitive and motor performance. We found that patients overall learned to increase activity of the target region during training with variable effects on cognitive and motor behavior. Improved cognitive and motor performance after training predicted increases in pre-SMA grey matter volume, fMRI activity in the left putamen, and increased SMA-left putamen functional connectivity. Although we did not directly target the putamen and corticostriatal connectivity during neurofeedback training, our results suggest that training the SMA can lead to regulation of associated networks with beneficial effects in behavior. We conclude that neurofeedback training can induce plasticity in patients with Huntington's disease despite the presence of neurodegeneration, and the effects of training a single region may engage other regions and circuits implicated in disease pathology.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronal PlasticityAdultAgedBrain MappingCognitionFemaleGray MatterHumansHuntington DiseaseLearningMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityMotor CortexNeurofeedbackbrain trainingHuntington's diseaseneurodegenerative diseasesneurofeedback trainingneuroplasticityreal-time fMRI

Identifiers

PMID29239063
PMCPMC5838530
OpenAlexW2772297489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.