Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238915›Full record

GuidelineClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

SEOM clinical guidelines for endometrial cancer (2017).

A Santaballa, X Matías-Guiu, A Redondo, N Carballo, M Gil, C Gómez, M Gorostidi, M Gutierrez, A Gónzalez-Martín

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 2017 SEOM guidelines: a multidisciplinary approach.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

A SantaballaServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain. santaballa_ana@gva.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-320X
X Matías-GuiuServicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
A RedondoServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
N CarballoServicio de Oncología Radioterápica, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
M GilServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Durán i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
C GómezServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain.
M GorostidiServicio de Ginecología, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, Donostia, Spain.
M GutierrezServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Unversitario de Araba, Vitoria, Spain.
A Gónzalez-MartínServicio de Oncología Médica, Clínica, Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESDonostiako Unibertsitate Ospitalea · ESDuran i Reynals Hospital · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario Araba · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Sofía · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. Most patients are diagnosed at an early stage with a low risk of relapse. However, there is a group of patients with a high risk of relapse and poor prognosis. Despite the recent publication of randomized trials, the adjuvant treatment of high-risk EC is still to be defined and there are many open questions about the best approach and the right timing. Unfortunately, the survival of metastatic or recurrent EC is short, due to the poor results of chemotherapy and the lack of a second line of treatment. Advances in the knowledge of the molecular abnormalities in EC have permitted the development of promising targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAdjuvant treatmentChemotherapyEndometrial cancerRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29238915
PMCPMC5785608
OpenAlexW2774088972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.