Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238900›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2018

Forecasting the 2001 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Epidemic in the UK.

David W Shanafelt, Glyn Jones, Mauricio Lima, Charles Perrings, Gerardo Chowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Infectious Disease Modelling · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An ensemblemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Transmission dynamics and control of COVID-19 in Chile, March-October, 2020.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Predicting the Epidemiological Outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David W ShanafeltCentre for Biodiversity, Theory and Modelling, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRS, Moulis, France.
Glyn JonesFera Science Ltd, Sand Hutton, York, UK.
Mauricio LimaCenter of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 114-D, 6513677, Santiago, Chile.
Charles PerringsSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Gerardo ChowellSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. gchowell@gsu.edu.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008894/1National Science Foundation 1414374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Near real-time epidemic forecasting approaches are needed to respond to the increasing number of infectious disease outbreaks. In this paper, we retrospectively assess the performance of simple phenomenological models that incorporate early sub-exponential growth dynamics to generate short-term forecasts of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in the UK. For this purpose, we employed the generalized-growth model (GGM) for pre-peak predictions and the generalized-Richards model (GRM) for post-peak predictions. The epidemic exhibits a growth-decelerating pattern as the relative growth rate declines inversely with time. The uncertainty of the parameter estimates [Formula: see text] narrows down and becomes more precise using an increasing amount of data of the epidemic growth phase. Indeed, using only the first 10-15 days of the epidemic, the scaling of growth parameter (p) displays wide uncertainty with the confidence interval for p ranging from values ~ 0.5 to 1.0, indicating that less than 15 epidemic days of data are not sufficient to discriminate between sub-exponential (i.e., p < 1) and exponential growth dynamics (i.e., p = 1). By contrast, using 20, 25, or 30 days of epidemic data, it is possible to recover estimates of p around 0.6 and the confidence interval is substantially below the exponential growth regime. Local and national bans on the movement of livestock and a nationwide cull of infected and contiguous premises likely contributed to the decelerating trajectory of the epidemic. The GGM and GRM provided useful 10-day forecasts of the epidemic before and after the peak of the epidemic, respectively. Short-term forecasts improved as the model was calibrated with an increasing length of the epidemic growth phase. Phenomenological models incorporating generalized-growth dynamics are useful tools to generate short-term forecasts of epidemic growth in near real time, particularly in the context of limited epidemiological data as well as information about transmission mechanisms and the effects of control interventions.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCommunicable Disease ControlDisease NotificationEpidemicsFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseForecastingHumansLivestockRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomEpidemic modelFoot-and-mouth diseaseForecastingSub-exponential growth

Identifiers

PMID29238900
PMCPMC6132414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.