Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238894›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2018

A nonparametric maximum likelihood approach for survival data with observed cured subjects, left truncation and right-censoring.

Jue Hou, Christina D Chambers, Ronghui Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fitting high-dimensional mixture cure models using the hdcuremodelsR package.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jue HouDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Christina D ChambersDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ronghui XuDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. rxu@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-0561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider observational studies in pregnancy where the outcome of interest is spontaneous abortion (SAB). This at first sight is a binary 'yes' or 'no' variable, albeit there is left truncation as well as right-censoring in the data. Women who do not experience SAB by gestational week 20 are 'cured' from SAB by definition, that is, they are no longer at risk. Our data is different from the common cure data in the literature, where the cured subjects are always right-censored and not actually observed to be cured. We consider a commonly used cure rate model, with the likelihood function tailored specifically to our data. We develop a conditional nonparametric maximum likelihood approach. To tackle the computational challenge we adopt an EM algorithm making use of "ghost copies" of the data, and a closed form variance estimator is derived. Under suitable assumptions, we prove the consistency of the resulting estimator which involves an unbounded cumulative baseline hazard function, as well as the asymptotic normality. Simulation results are carried out to evaluate the finite sample performance. We present the analysis of the motivating SAB study to illustrate the advantages of our model addressing both occurrence and timing of SAB, as compared to existing approaches in practice.

Indexed as

Likelihood FunctionsSurvival AnalysisAbortion, SpontaneousAlgorithmsFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyStatistics, NonparametricCure rate modelEM algorithmGhost copy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.