Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238875›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

Pepsin in saliva as a diagnostic biomarker in laryngopharyngeal reflux: a meta-analysis.

Jing Wang, Yu Zhao, Jianjun Ren, Yang Xu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Pepsin in Saliva as a Diagnostic Marker for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Influence of proton pump inhibitor therapy on occurrence of voice prosthesis complications.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Trial
  5. Inverse correlation between acid reflux and dwell time of voice protheses (ProvoxEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Global research trends and knowledge gaps in chronic pharyngitis: A bibliometric analysis (2007-2025).European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Salivary pH testing in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review article: Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Saliva pepsin measurements in the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing WangDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yu ZhaoDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. yutzhao@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1874-908X
Jianjun RenDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yang XuDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2012017yjsy118National Natural Science Foundation of China 30801280National Natural Science Foundation of China 81170898the International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Projects of Sichuan Province 2016HH0064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePepsin in saliva has been proposed as a biomarker for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the results remain controversial. We assessed the diagnostic value of pepsin in saliva for LPR.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies in English that evaluated the utility of pepsin in saliva in the diagnosis of LPR, published up to 15 March 2017. We used Stata 12.0 to summarize the diagnostic indexes for the meta-analysis.

resultsEleven eligible studies met the inclusion criteria. After the meta-analysis of included studies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-80%] and 68% (95% CI 55-78%), respectively; the positive (PLR) and negative (NLR) likelihood ratios were 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-2.9) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.33-0.87), respectively; the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 4 (95% CI 2-8); and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.75).

conclusionPepsin in saliva has moderate value in the diagnosis of LPR. The cutoff value used could affect the diagnostic value. Therefore, further investigations are required to find the optimal method to detect salivary pepsin in diagnosing LPR.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansLaryngopharyngeal RefluxPepsin ASalivaSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersPepsin ADiagnostic valueLaryngopharyngeal refluxMeta-analysisPepsinSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.