ArticleEuropean radiology2018
Validation of goose liver fat measurement by QCT and CSE-MRI with biochemical extraction and pathology as reference.
Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- KNLR: A heterogeneous ensemble learner for predicting Foie gras weight grade in mule ducks (Anas platyrhynchos × Cairina moschata).Poultry science · 2026Article
- Clinical assessment of hepatic steatosis and iron content using three-dimensional (3D) multi-echo chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): correlation with histopathology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Integrated model based on ultrasound attenuation and metabolic biomarkers for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fat fraction categories in MASLD: a QCT-referenced study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Liver fat fraction negatively correlates with lumbar BMD in normal body mass index postmenopausal women: mediated by bone marrow fat.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive assessment of renal fat deposition and hypoxia in diabetic kidney disease.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Biochemical, sex hormonal, and anthropometric predictors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in polycystic ovary syndrome.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Diagnostic of fatty liver using radiomics and deep learning models on non-contrast abdominal CT.PloS one · 2025Article
- Study on the effect of different types of sugar on proliferation and inflammatory in goose fatty liver.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- CT-based methods for assessment of metabolic dysfunction associated with fatty liver disease.European radiology experimental · 2023Review
- Integrative analysis of transcriptome and lipidome reveals fructose pro-steatosis mechanism in goose fatty liver.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- [Quantitative analysis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on MRI proton density fat fraction in the coastal region of Qingdao].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2021Article
- An inverted U-shaped relationship between parathyroid hormone and body weight, body mass index, body fat.Endocrine · 2021Article
- Quantification of Fat Metaplasia in the Sacroiliac Joints of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis by Chemical Shift-Encoded MRI: A Diagnostic Trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Prospective comparison of longitudinal change in hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimated by magnitude-based MRI (MRI-M) and complex-based MRI (MRI-C).European radiology · 2020Article
- Pancreatic Fat is not significantly correlated with β-cell Dysfunction in Patients with new-onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus using quantitative Computed Tomography.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Review
- Recent Issues on Body Composition Imaging for Sarcopenia Evaluation.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Review
- How to best assess abdominal obesity.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2018Review
- MRI liver fat quantification in an oncologic population: the added value of complex chemical shift-encoded MRI.Clinical imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to validate the accuracy and reliability of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) to assess hepatic steatosis.
methodsTwenty-two geese with a wide range of hepatic steatosis were collected. After QCT and CSE-MRI examinations, the liver of each goose was removed and samples were taken from the left lobe, upper and lower half of the right lobe for biochemical measurement and histology. Fat percentages by QCT and proton density fat fraction by MRI (MRI-PDFF) were measured within the sample regions of biochemical measurement and histology. The accuracy of QCT and MR measurements were assessed through Spearman correlation coefficients (r) and Passing and Bablok regression equations using biochemical measurement as the "gold standard".
resultsBoth QCT and MRI correlated highly with chemical extraction [r = 0.922 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.949 (p < 0.001) respectively]. Chemically extracted triglyceride was accurately predicted by both QCT liver fat percentages (Y = 0.6 + 0.866 × X) and by MRI-PDFF (Y = -1.8 + 0.773 × X).
conclusionsQCT and CSE-MRI measurements of goose liver fat were accurate and reliable compared with biochemical measurement. KEY POINTS: • QCT and CSE-MRI can measure liver fat content accurately and reliably • Histological grading of hepatic steatosis has larger sampling variability • QCT and CSE-MRI have potential in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29238866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.