ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017
Penile prosthesis in the management of erectile dysfunction following cancer therapy.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate cancer survivorship in modern times - insights into management of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence for clinically localized prostate cancer survivors in the United States.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Continued Usage of Intracavernosal injections for Erectile Dysfunction: A Retrospective Analysis.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Complication rates in concurrent inflatable penile prosthesis and incontinence surgery: Comparing the penoscrotal versus perineal incision approach.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Erectile Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivors and Current Management Options.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Association between masturbation and functional outcome in the postoperative course after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- An outcomes analysis of penile prosthesis implantation following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a multicentric retrospective cohort study.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
- Management of Climacturia During Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery.Current urology reports · 2019Review
- Erectile dysfunction following cancer therapy: is there a role for penile rehabilitation?Translational andrology and urology · 2017Article
- Risk profiling in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation.Asian journal of andrologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common problem in older men and occurs with even greater frequency following the treatment of pelvic malignancies. Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a safe and effective form of definitive ED treatment for those men who fail more conservative measures, and it can be used with similar outcomes in men following cancer therapy. Although many of these men remain dissatisfied with other therapeutic options for ED, IPPs are underutilized in this population. This review will discuss the current practice patterns, outcomes and nuances to surgical technique regarding the use of IPPs in patients with ED following cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.