ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017
Medical pre-operative considerations for patients undergoing penile implantation.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the UK: are we following the guidelines?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Practice patterns of Canadian penile prosthesis implanters A survey-based analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Penile prosthesis in the medically complex patient: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Assessing psychiatric risk with a focus on optimizing patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis placement-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Complications and troubleshooting in primary penile prosthetic surgery-a review.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- A narrative review on malleable and inflatable penile implants: choosing the right implant for the right patient.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Tips and tricks in the management of inflatable penile prosthesis infection: A review.Arab journal of urology · 2021Review
- The value of medical pre-operative assessment for patients receiving penile prostheses.Translational andrology and urology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile prosthesis surgery has become the standard treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction refractory to medical management. Refinements in the both the surgical technique and device manufacturing have made this a safe and reliable treatment with excellent patient satisfaction. In this review, we will overview the basic medical and pre-operative considerations for patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation. We intend to provide a simple and practical checklist for the implanter to reference when considering implantation of a penile prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.