Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238654›Full record

ReviewCurrent geriatrics reports2017

Primary Endocrine Therapy in Older Women with Breast Cancer.

R M C Pepping, J E A Portielje, W van de Water, N A de Glas

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current geriatrics reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aging and cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R M C PeppingDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
J E A PortieljeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
W van de WaterDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
N A de GlasDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLHaga Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBreast cancer incidence increases with age. In recent years, primary endocrine therapy has been increasingly used as a treatment option for frail elderly women with breast cancer, although surgery is still the guideline-recommended treatment. In this review, we discuss the evidence for primary endocrine therapy versus surgical treatment in older women with early breast cancer. RECENT

findingsBoth randomised controlled trials and recent observational studies showed a favourable progression-free survival but not overall survival for surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy versus primary endocrine therapy. Information about quality of life with either treatment strategy is so far lacking. Deciding who is fit for surgery and has sufficiently long life expectation to be at risk of disease progression can be supported by performing an individual geriatric assessment. SUMMARY: This review suggests that primary endocrine therapy is a reasonable alternative to primary surgery in frail older women with breast cancer. Future studies should focus on the long-term effects on quality of life and physical functioning.

Indexed as

Breast cancerElderlyGeriatric assessmentGeriatric oncologyPrimary endocrine therapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID29238654
PMCPMC5719125
OpenAlexW2766110182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.