Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238598›Full record

ReviewHorticulture research2017

Breeding next generation tree fruits: technical and legal challenges.

Lorenza Dalla Costa, Mickael Malnoy, Ivana Gribaudo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Horticulture research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenza Dalla CostaResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E Mach 1, San Michele a/Adige 38010, Italy.
Mickael MalnoyResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E Mach 1, San Michele a/Adige 38010, Italy.
Ivana GribaudoIPSP-CNR, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino I-10135, Italy.
Fondazione Edmund Mach · ITInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new plant breeding technologies (NPBTs) have recently emerged as powerful tools in the context of 'green' biotechnologies. They have wide potential compared to classical genetic engineering and they are attracting the interest of politicians, stakeholders and citizens due to the revolutionary impact they may have on agriculture. Cisgenesis and genome editing potentially allow to obtain pathogen-resistant plants or plants with enhanced qualitative traits by introducing or disrupting specific genes in shorter times compared to traditional breeding programs and by means of minimal modifications in the plant genome. Grapevine, the most important fruit crop in the world from an economical point of view, is a peculiar case for NPBTs because of the load of cultural aspects, varietal traditions and consumer demands, which hinder the use of classical breeding techniques and, furthermore, the application of genetic engineering to wine grape cultivars. Here we explore the technical challenges which may hamper the application of cisgenesis and genome editing to this perennial plant, in particular focusing on the bottlenecks of the

Identifiers

PMID29238598
PMCPMC5717367
OpenAlexW2775720390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.