Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238552›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior.

Marianna Chimienti, Thomas Cornulier, Ellie Owen, Mark Bolton, Ian M Davies, Justin M J Travis, Beth E Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A critical evaluation of the index of patch quality.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimal diving: patch quality, depth, and marginal value.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marianna ChimientiSchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8236-9332
Thomas CornulierSchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.
Ellie OwenRSPB Centre for Conservation Science North Scotland Office Inverness UK.
Mark BoltonRSPB Centre for Conservation Science The Lodge Sandy Bedfordshire UK.
Ian M DaviesMarine Scotland Science Marine Laboratory Scottish Government Aberdeen UK.
Justin M J TravisSchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.
Beth E ScottSchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed information acquired using tracking technology has the potential to provide accurate pictures of the types of movements and behaviors performed by animals. To date, such data have not been widely exploited to provide inferred information about the foraging habitat. We collected data using multiple sensors (GPS, time depth recorders, and accelerometers) from two species of diving seabirds, razorbills (

Indexed as

animal movementsforaging strategiespatch profitabilitypredatorsprey availability

Identifiers

PMID29238552
PMCPMC5723613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.