Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238228›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2017

Prenatal exposure to antipsychotic medication and use of primary health care system in childhood: a population-based cohort study in Denmark.

Anne Mette Lund Würtz, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Dorte Rytter, Merete Juul Sørensen, Jakob Christensen, Mogens Vestergaard, Bodil Hammer Bech

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne Mette Lund WürtzResearch Unit for General Practice.
Claus Høstrup VestergaardResearch Unit for General Practice.
Dorte RytterSection for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University.
Merete Juul SørensenRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Jakob ChristensenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital.
Mogens VestergaardResearch Unit for General Practice.
Bodil Hammer BechResearch Unit for General Practice.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKAmerican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic (AP) medication is increasingly used for many health conditions. Prenatal exposure to AP medication has been associated with several adverse outcomes, but the findings remain inconsistent. PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate prenatal exposure to AP medication and the use of primary health care system in childhood. SUBJECTS AND

methodsAll live-born singletons in Denmark during 1997-2012 were identified in the nationwide Danish National Patient Register and followed until December 31, 2013 (n = 963,010). Information on prenatal exposure to AP medication was obtained from the Danish Register of Medicinal Product Statistics. Contacts to the general practitioner (GP) were used as a proxy for the overall health of the children. Negative binomial regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between prenatal exposure to AP medication and number and type of GP contacts, excluding routine well-child visits and vaccinations. The models were adjusted for sex and birth date of the child, maternal age, parity, cohabitation status, income, education, smoking status, diagnosis of substance abuse, severe psychiatric disorder, depression and epilepsy as well as the use of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, benzodiazepines and insulin.

resultsThe prenatally AP-exposed children had 7% more GP contacts than unexposed children, IRR: 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.11). The association was slightly stronger among children of mothers with no diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (IRR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13) than among children of mothers with severe psychiatric disorder (IRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.96-1.11), but the difference was not statistically significant. We found no difference between prenatally AP-exposed children and their unexposed siblings, IRR: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.04) for total contacts.

conclusionChildren of women using AP medication in pregnancy had more GP contacts in childhood than children of mothers not using AP medication. However, this might be explained by confounding from maternal behavior and mental illness.

Indexed as

antipsychotic medicationgeneral practitionerprenatal drug exposureprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID29238228
PMCPMC5716673
OpenAlexW2774229161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.