Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238184›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2017

Determinants of exacerbation risk in patients with COPD in the TIOSPIR study.

Peter Ma Calverley, Kay Tetzlaff, Daniel Dusser, Robert A Wise, Achim Mueller, Norbert Metzdorf, Antonio Anzueto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effect of Erdosteine on COPD Exacerbations in COPD Patients with Moderate Airflow Limitation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Future concepts in bronchodilation for COPD: dual-European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter Ma CalverleyClinical Science Centre, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Kay TetzlaffRespiratory Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Daniel DusserDepartment of Pneumology, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Robert A WiseDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Achim MuellerBiostatistics and Data Sciences Europe, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Norbert MetzdorfRespiratory Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Antonio AnzuetoPulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Texas Health Sciences Center and South Texas Veterans' Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExacerbation history is used to grade the risk of COPD exacerbation, but its reliability and relationship to other risk factors and prior therapy is unclear. To examine these interrelationships, we conducted a post hoc analysis of patients in the TIOSPIR trial with ≥2 years' follow-up or who died on treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients were grouped by their annual exacerbation rate on treatment into nonexacerbators, infrequent, and frequent exacerbators (annual exacerbation rates 0, ≤1, and >1, respectively), and baseline characteristics discriminating among the groups were determined. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to explore the effect of baseline characteristics on risk of exacerbation, hospitalization (severe exacerbation), and death (all causes).

resultsOf 13,591 patients, 6,559 (48.3%) were nonexacerbators, 4,568 (33.6%) were infrequent exacerbators, and 2,464 (18.1%) were frequent exacerbators; 45% of patients without exacerbations in the previous year exacerbated on treatment. Multivariate analysis identified baseline pulmonary maintenance medication as a predictive factor of increased exacerbation risk, with inhaled corticosteroid treatment associated with increased exacerbation risk irrespective of exacerbation history.

conclusionOur data confirm established risk factors for exacerbation, but highlight the limitations of exacerbation history when categorizing patients and the importance of prior treatment when identifying exacerbation risk.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAgedBronchodilator AgentsCause of DeathChi-Square DistributionDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLungMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsCOPDexacerbationfrequent exacerbators

Identifiers

PMID29238184
PMCPMC5713692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.