Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238153›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Risk Factors for Open Conversion in Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy.

Antonio Gangemi, Richard Danilkowicz, Francesco Bianco, Mario Masrur, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feasibility of Routine Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Brazil.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio GangemiDivision of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Richard DanilkowiczDivision of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Francesco BiancoDivision of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mario MasrurDivision of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Pier Cristoforo GiulianottiDivision of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOpen conversion (OC) occurs in 5 to 10% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) and results in suboptimal outcomes. Herein, we report our experience with OC in cholecystectomy performed with the minimally invasive (MIS) approach.

methodsData from 960 minimally invasive cholecystectomies performed in the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery were retrospectively compiled. Patient demographics and outcomes were analyzed for the major indicators that may predispose to OC.

resultsMale gender and intraoperative diagnosis of acute or gangrenous cholecystitis were identified as statistically significant individual predictors for OC. Conversion incidence was significantly lower in every paired demographic combination when compared with the laparoscopic data.

conclusionsOur retrospective study identified some specific factors associated with significantly higher risk of OC in both laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy. The impact of these risk factors seems to be lesser in the robotic than in the laparoscopic approach. Further investigation is necessary to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystitisConversion to Open SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultCholecystectomyConversion to open surgeryLaparoscopyRiskRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID29238153
PMCPMC5714218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.