Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238107›Full record

ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2017

Hemispheric divided coiling technique for coil embolization of middle- and large-sized intracranial aneurysms.

Tomotaka Ohshima, Shunsaku Goto, Taiki Yamamoto, Kojiro Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomotaka OhshimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.
Shunsaku GotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.
Taiki YamamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.
Kojiro IshikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.
Kariya Toyota General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major developments in treating intracranial aneurysms by endovascular coil embolization, complete occlusion of the entire aneurysmal neck remains a problem. We present a novel endovascular strategy for middle- and large sized aneurysms called the "hemispheric divided coiling technique" and compare the short-term follow-up results of this technique with those of conventional coil embolization. Ten patients (mean age, 69.7 ± 9.7 years) with middle- or large-sized ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms (mean maximum aneurysmal diameter, 12.09 ± 3.6 mm) were treated by the hemispheric divided coiling technique, in combination with various adjunctive techniques. We compared the initial occlusion grade, volume embolization ratio, and recurrence rate in this group of patients (hemispheric group) with the results from 20 previous cases (conventional group: mean age, 62.8 ± 9.8 years; mean maximum aneurysmal diameter, 11.43 ± 3.5 mm). The mean volume embolization ratio of the hemispheric group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (42.3% vs. 31.1%). The hemispheric divided coiling technique achieved a high volume embolization ratio for middle- and large sized intracranial aneurysms, with a low recurrence rate.

Indexed as

AgedAneurysm, RupturedAngiography, Digital SubtractionCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomecoil embolizationendovascular treatmentintracranial aneurysms

Identifiers

PMID29238107
PMCPMC5719210
OpenAlexW2786797140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.