Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29238085›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2017

Communication dynamics in complex brain networks.

Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger, Bratislav Misic, Olaf Sporns

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Shared spatial and temporal principles govern connectome dynamics across timescales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A causal role for the posterior corpus callosum in bimanual coordination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea Avena-KoenigsbergerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Bratislav MisicMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.
Olaf SpornsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.

Funding

CRCNS: Linking connectomic and large-Scale Dynamics of the Human BrainR01AT009036 · NCCIH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI SPORNS, OLAF · 2015 to 2017
$443k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal signalling and communication underpin virtually all aspects of brain activity and function. Network science approaches to modelling and analysing the dynamics of communication on networks have proved useful for simulating functional brain connectivity and predicting emergent network states. This Review surveys important aspects of communication dynamics in brain networks. We begin by sketching a conceptual framework that views communication dynamics as a necessary link between the empirical domains of structural and functional connectivity. We then consider how different local and global topological attributes of structural networks support potential patterns of network communication, and how the interactions between network topology and dynamic models can provide additional insights and constraints. We end by proposing that communication dynamics may act as potential generative models of effective connectivity and can offer insight into the mechanisms by which brain networks transform and process information.

Indexed as

BrainHumansMental ProcessesModels, NeurologicalNeural Pathways

Identifiers

PMID29238085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.