ArticleNature reviews. Cardiology2018
Trends in rate of acute myocardial infarction among patients aged <30 years.
Article in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Disease in Singleton Offspring Born of Pregnancies Complicated by Placental Abruption: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular imaging for the detection of asymptomatic coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Serum vitamin C associated with lipids levels in children and adolescents: a national cross-sectional study.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Temporal trends of presumed cardiac origin out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence in Guangzhou, southern China: A 10-year consecutive analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- A ultra-stable point of care nanozyme-based kit for cTnI detection in human serum.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Resilience and its influencing factors after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in young and middle-aged patients with first acute myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- miR-146a-5p, miR-223-3p and miR-142-3p as Potential Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Young Patients with Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Added Value over Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Indices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nanotechnological approach to delivering nutraceuticals as promising drug candidates for the treatment of atherosclerosis.Drug delivery · 2021Review
- Rapid detection of human heart-type fatty acid-binding protein in human plasma and blood using a colloidal gold-based lateral flow immunoassay.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical investigation of acute myocardial infarction according to age subsets.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Recent trends in acute myocardial infarction among the young.Current opinion in cardiology · 2020Review
- Protective effect of morin on myocardial ischemia‑reperfusion injury in rats.International journal of molecular medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29238053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.