Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29237852›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.

Aaron Sell, Aaron W Lukazsweski, Michael Townsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Women's Preferences for Strong Men Under Perceived Harsh Versus Safe Ecological Conditions.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Trial
  3. Sex Biases in Patterns of Parental Investment.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Shape of You: Eye-Tracking and Social Perceptions of the Human Body.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A botanical extract blend ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron SellSchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Queensland 4121, Australia a.sell@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6734-8883
Aaron W LukazsweskiDepartment of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA.
Michael TownsleySchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Queensland 4121, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution equips sexually reproducing species with mate choice mechanisms that function to evaluate the reproductive consequences of mating with different individuals. Indeed, evolutionary psychologists have shown that women's mate choice mechanisms track many cues of men's genetic quality and ability to invest resources in the woman and her offspring. One variable that predicted both a man's genetic quality and his ability to invest is the man's formidability (i.e. fighting ability or resource holding power/potential). Modern women, therefore, should have mate choice mechanisms that respond to ancestral cues of a man's fighting ability. One crucial component of a man's ability to fight is his upper body strength. Here, we test how important physical strength is to men's bodily attractiveness. Three sets of photographs of men's bodies were shown to raters who estimated either their physical strength or their attractiveness. Estimates of physical strength determined over 70% of men's bodily attractiveness. Additional analyses showed that tallness and leanness were also favoured, and, along with estimates of physical strength, accounted for 80% of men's bodily attractiveness. Contrary to popular theories of men's physical attractiveness, there was no evidence of a nonlinear effect; the strongest men were the most attractive in all samples.

Indexed as

BeautyCuesMuscle StrengthAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultattractivenessformidabilitymate selectionphysical strength

Identifiers

PMID29237852
PMCPMC5745404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.