Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29237586›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Using Social Media Data to Understand the Impact of Promotional Information on Laypeople's Discussions: A Case Study of Lynch Syndrome.

Jiang Bian, Yunpeng Zhao, Ramzi G Salloum, Yi Guo, Mo Wang, Mattia Prosperi, Hansi Zhang, Xinsong Du, Laura J Ramirez-Diaz, Zhe He and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Data and Model Biases in Social Media Analyses: A Case Study of COVID-19 Tweets.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  12. Social Media Multidimensional Analysis for Intelligent Health Surveillance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mining Twitter to Assess the Determinants of Health Behavior towards Palliative Care in the United States.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  16. ML-Net: multi-label classification of biomedical texts with deep neural networks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiang Bian *Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-5429
Yunpeng Zhao *Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5771-3373
Ramzi G SalloumDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8139-2418
Yi GuoDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0587-4105
Mo WangDepartment of Management, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-3549
Mattia ProsperiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-5595
Hansi ZhangDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-0888
Xinsong DuDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3713-3264
Laura J Ramirez-DiazDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-6132
Zhe HeSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-0244
Yuan SunSchool of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8659-1870
University of Florida · USFlorida State University · USZhejiang Gongshang University · CN

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media is being used by various stakeholders among pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, health care organizations, professionals, and news media as a way of engaging audiences to raise disease awareness and ultimately to improve public health. Nevertheless, it is unclear what effects this health information has on laypeople.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a detailed examination of how promotional health information related to Lynch syndrome impacts laypeople's discussions on a social media platform (Twitter) in terms of topic awareness and attitudes.

methodsWe used topic modeling and sentiment analysis techniques on Lynch syndrome-related tweets to answer the following research questions (RQs): (1) what are the most discussed topics in Lynch syndrome-related tweets?; (2) how promotional Lynch syndrome-related information on Twitter affects laypeople's discussions?; and (3) what impact do the Lynch syndrome awareness activities in the Colon Cancer Awareness Month and Lynch Syndrome Awareness Day have on laypeople's discussions and their attitudes? In particular, we used a set of keywords to collect Lynch syndrome-related tweets from October 26, 2016 to August 11, 2017 (289 days) through the Twitter public search application programming interface (API). We experimented with two different classification methods to categorize tweets into the following three classes: (1) irrelevant, (2) promotional health information, and (3) laypeople's discussions. We applied a topic modeling method to discover the themes in these Lynch syndrome-related tweets and conducted sentiment analysis on each layperson's tweet to gauge the writer's attitude (ie, positive, negative, and neutral) toward Lynch syndrome. The topic modeling and sentiment analysis results were elaborated to answer the three RQs.

resultsOf all tweets (N=16,667), 87.38% (14,564/16,667) were related to Lynch syndrome. Of the Lynch syndrome-related tweets, 81.43% (11,860/14,564) were classified as promotional and 18.57% (2704/14,564) were classified as laypeople's discussions. The most discussed themes were treatment (n=4080) and genetic testing (n=3073). We found that the topic distributions in laypeople's discussions were similar to the distributions in promotional Lynch syndrome-related information. Furthermore, most people had a positive attitude when discussing Lynch syndrome. The proportion of negative tweets was 3.51%. Within each topic, treatment (16.67%) and genetic testing (5.60%) had more negative tweets compared with other topics. When comparing monthly trends, laypeople's discussions had a strong correlation with promotional Lynch syndrome-related information on awareness (r=.98, P<.001), while there were moderate correlations on screening (r=.602, P=.05), genetic testing (r=.624, P=.04), treatment (r=.69, P=.02), and risk (r=.66, P=.03). We also discovered that the Colon Cancer Awareness Month (March 2017) and the Lynch Syndrome Awareness Day (March 22, 2017) had significant positive impacts on laypeople's discussions and their attitudes.

conclusionsThere is evidence that participative social media platforms, namely Twitter, offer unique opportunities to inform cancer communication surveillance and to explore the mechanisms by which these new communication media affect individual health behavior and population health.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisHealth PromotionHumansPublic HealthSocial MediaLynch syndromepublic health surveillancesentiment analysissocial media

Identifiers

PMID29237586
PMCPMC5745354
OpenAlexW2775623353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.