Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29237554›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2019

Feature-based attention potentiates recovery of fine direction discrimination in cortically blind patients.

Matthew R Cavanaugh, Antoine Barbot, Marisa Carrasco, Krystel R Huxlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. In search of exogenous feature-based attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exogenous Spatial Attention Helps Overcome Spatial Specificity of Visual Learning in the Blind Field After V1 Damage.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  10. Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Localizes Residual Visual Function in Hemianopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current directions in visual perceptual learning.Nature reviews psychology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew R CavanaughFlaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Antoine BarbotFlaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Krystel R HuxlinFlaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GREGORY C DEANGELIS · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELAKI, DORA · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Vision recovery in cortical blindnessR01EY027314 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MARISA CARRASCO, Krystel R Huxlin · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Mechanisms of visual learning in cortical blindnessR01EY021209 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUXLIN, KRYSTEL R · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Properties of training-induced visual recovery in cortical blindnessF31EY025918 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CAVANAUGH, MATTHEW R. · 2016 to 2016
$37k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY025918NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021209NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027314NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training chronic, cortically-blind (CB) patients on a coarse [left-right] direction discrimination and integration (CDDI) task recovers performance on this task at trained, blind field locations. However, fine direction difference (FDD) thresholds remain elevated at these locations, limiting the usefulness of recovered vision in daily life. Here, we asked if this FDD impairment can be overcome by training CB subjects with endogenous, feature-based attention (FBA) cues. Ten CB subjects were recruited and trained on CDDI and FDD with an FBA cue or FDD with a neutral cue. After completion of each training protocol, FDD thresholds were re-measured with both neutral and FBA cues at trained, blind-field locations and at corresponding, intact-field locations. In intact portions of the visual field, FDD thresholds were lower when tested with FBA than neutral cues. Training subjects in the blind field on the CDDI task improved FDD performance to the point that a threshold could be measured, but these locations remained impaired relative to the intact field. FDD training with neutral cues resulted in better blind field FDD thresholds than CDDI training, but thresholds remained impaired relative to intact field levels, regardless of testing cue condition. Importantly, training FDD in the blind field with FBA lowered FDD thresholds relative to CDDI training, and allowed the blind field to reach thresholds similar to the intact field, even when FBA trained subjects were tested with a neutral rather than FBA cue. Finally, FDD training appeared to also recover normal integration thresholds at trained, blind-field locations, providing an interesting double dissociation with respect to CDDI training. In summary, mechanisms governing FBA appear to function normally in both intact and impaired regions of the visual field following V1 damage. Our results mark the first time that FDD thresholds in CB fields have been seen to reach intact field levels of performance. Moreover, FBA can be leveraged during visual training to recover normal, fine direction discrimination and integration performance at trained, blind-field locations, potentiating visual recovery of more complex and precise aspects of motion perception in cortically-blinded fields.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalAdultAgedAttentionBlindness, CorticalCuesFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionOrientationRecovery of FunctionStrokeGlobal motionHemianopiaPerceptual learningRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID29237554
PMCPMC5994362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.