ArticleSystematic reviews2017
Government policy interventions to reduce human antimicrobial use: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Study reporting quality among interventions to reduce antibiotic use is a barrier to evidence-informed policymaking on antimicrobial resistance: systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2020Pooled it
- Government policy interventions to reduce human antimicrobial use: A systematic review and evidence map.PLoS medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of point-of-care tests for causes of non-malarial febrile illnesses in low-resource settings: a case study from Lao PDR.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Adopted Hospital Policies That Combat Antibacterial Resistance in Selected Health Facilities in Uganda.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Exploring Models for an International Legal Agreement on the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Lessons from Climate Agreements.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2023Article
- Governing the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Introduction to Special Issue.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2023Article
- How Antimicrobial Resistance Is Linked to Climate Change: An Overview of Two Intertwined Global Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Strengthening the science of addressing antimicrobial resistance: a framework for planning, conducting and disseminating antimicrobial resistance intervention research.Health research policy and systems · 2020Review
- Ten Years of Inaction on Antimicrobial Resistance: An Environmental Scan of Policies in Canada from 2008 to 2018.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Allplex™ Entero-DR assay for detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants from bacterial cultures.BMC research notes · 2020Article
- Article
- Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure.Palgrave communications · 2019Article
- Article
- Preoperative oral hygiene recommendation before open-heart surgery: patients' adherence and reduction of infections: a quality improvement study.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
- Structure-based Druggability Assessment of Anti-virulence Targets from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Current protein & peptide science · 2019Review
- Probing popular and political discourse on antimicrobial resistance in China.Global health research and policy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a recognized threat to global public health. Increasing AMR and a dry pipeline of novel antimicrobial drugs have put AMR in the international spotlight. One strategy to combat AMR is to reduce antimicrobial drug consumption. Governments around the world have been experimenting with different policy interventions, such as regulating where antimicrobials can be sold, restricting the use of last-resort antimicrobials, funding AMR stewardship programs, and launching public awareness campaigns. To inform future action, governments should have access to synthesized data on the effectiveness of large-scale AMR interventions. This planned systematic review will (1) identify and describe previously evaluated government policy interventions to reduce human antimicrobial use and (2) estimate the effectiveness of these different strategies.
methodsAn electronic search strategy has been developed in consultation with two research librarians. Seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PAIS Index, Web of Science, and PubMed excluding MEDLINE) will be searched, and additional studies will be identified using several gray literature search strategies. To be included, a study must (1) clearly describe the government policy and (2) use a rigorous design to quantitatively measure the impact of the policy on human antibiotic use. The intervention of interest is any policy intervention enacted by a government or government agency in any country to change human antimicrobial use. Two independent reviewers will screen for eligibility using criteria defined a priori. Data will be extracted with Covidence software using a customized extraction form. If sufficient data exists, a meta-analysis by intervention type will be conducted as part of the effectiveness review. However, if there are too few studies or if the interventions are too heterogeneous, data will be tabulated and a narrative synthesis strategy will be used. DISCUSSION: This evidence synthesis is intended for use by policymakers, public health practitioners, and researchers to inform future government policies aiming to address antimicrobial resistance. This review will also identify gaps in the evidence about the effectiveness of different policy interventions to inform future research priorities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017067514 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.