Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29237416›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

A network-based predictive gene-expression signature for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in stage II colorectal cancer.

Bangrong Cao, Liping Luo, Lin Feng, Shiqi Ma, Tingqing Chen, Yuan Ren, Xiao Zha, Shujun Cheng, Kaitai Zhang, Changmin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bangrong CaoDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Liping LuoDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Lin FengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shiqi MaDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Tingqing ChenDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Yuan RenDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Xiao ZhaDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Shujun ChengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kaitai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. zhangkt@cicams.ac.cn.
Changmin ChenDepartment of Basic Research, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Renmin Ave. Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. changmin_chen@sichuancancer.org.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNSichuan Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province 2015JY0011National Natural Science Foundation of China 81602731Sichuan Cancer Hospital Research Fund YB2013001The national key research and development program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2016YFC0905301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. This study aimed to explore novel gene signature to predict outcome benefit of postoperative 5-Fu-based therapy in stage II CRC.

methodsGene-expression profiles of stage II CRCs from two datasets with 5-Fu-based adjuvant chemotherapy (training dataset, n = 212; validation dataset, n = 85) were analyzed to identify the indicator. A systemic approach by integrating gene-expression and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was implemented to develop the predictive signature. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Experiments with shRNA knock-down were carried out to confirm the signature identified in this study.

resultsIn the training dataset, we identified 44 PPI sub-modules, by which we separate patients into two clusters (1 and 2) having different chemotherapeutic benefit. A predictor of 11 PPI sub-modules (11-PPI-Mod) was established to discriminate the two sub-groups, with an overall accuracy of 90.1%. This signature was independently validated in an external validation dataset. Kaplan-Meier curves showed an improved outcome for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy in Cluster 1 sub-group, but even worse survival for those in Cluster 2 sub-group. Similar results were found in both the training and the validation dataset. Multivariate Cox regression revealed an interaction effect between 11-PPI-Mod signature and adjuvant therapy treatment in the training dataset (RFS, p = 0.007; OS, p = 0.006) and the validation dataset (RFS, p = 0.002). From the signature, we found that PTGES gene was up-regulated in CRC cells which were more resistant to 5-Fu. Knock-down of PTGES indicated a growth inhibition and up-regulation of apoptotic markers induced by 5-Fu in CRC cells.

conclusionsOnly a small proportion of stage II CRC patients could benefit from adjuvant therapy. The 11-PPI-Mod as a potential predictor could be helpful to distinguish this sub-group with favorable outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantCluster AnalysisColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Interaction MapsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, Tumor11-PPI-ModAdjuvant chemotherapyBiomarkersColorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID29237416
PMCPMC5729289
OpenAlexW2774181393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.