ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2018
Pharmacist-physician collaborative care model and time to goal blood pressure in the uninsured population.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time in Target Range for Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Key components of success in a randomized trial of blood pressure telemonitoring with medication therapy management pharmacists.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhATrial
- Impact of pharmacist-physician collaborative care on hemoglobin A1c and blood pressure quality measure achievement in primary care.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacist Prescribing for Managing Hypertension in the United States.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Measuring Interprofessional Collaboration's Impact on Healthcare Services Using the Quadruple Aim Framework: A Protocol Paper.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Questionnaire survey on pharmacists' roles among non- and health care professionals in medium-sized cities in Japan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Intensifying approaches to address clinical inertia among cardiovascular disease risk factors: A narrative review.Patient education and counseling · 2022Review
- Impact of an ambulatory care pharmacist on provider relative value units in a rural clinic.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Development and implementation of blood pressure screening and referral guidelines for German community pharmacists.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Knowledge of heart attack and stroke symptoms among US Native American Adults: a cross-sectional population-based study analyzing a multi-year BRFSS database.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Perspectives of primary care physicians and pharmacists on interprofessional collaboration in Kuwait: A quantitative study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Pharmacist-physician collaborative care model and time to goal blood pressure in the uninsured population.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Collaborative care model for hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacist-physician collaborative practice models (PPCPMs) improve blood pressure (BP) control, but their effect on time to goal BP is unknown. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of a PPCPM on time to goal BP compared with usual care using data from existing medical records in uninsured patients with hypertension. The primary outcome was time from the initial visit to the first follow-up visit with a BP <140/90 mm Hg. The study included 377 patients (259 = PPCPM; 118 = usual care). Median time to BP goal was 36 days vs 259 days in the PPCPM and usual care cohorts, respectively (P < .001). At 12 months, BP control was 81% and 44% in the PPCPM and usual care cohorts, respectively (P < .001) and therapeutic inertia was lower in the PPCPM cohort (27.6%) compared with usual care (43.7%) (P < .0001). Collaborative models involving pharmacists should be considered to improve BP control in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.