Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29237009›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Recent Trends in Chemotherapy Use and Oncologists' Treatment Recommendations for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Allison W Kurian, Irina Bondarenko, Reshma Jagsi, Christopher R Friese, M Chandler McLeod, Sarah T Hawley, Ann S Hamilton, Kevin C Ward, Timothy P Hofer, Steven J Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Simulation andJournal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quality of life and fatigue before and after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Allison W KurianDepartment of Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Irina BondarenkoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine.
Christopher R FrieseDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing.
M Chandler McLeodDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health.
Sarah T HawleyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health.
Ann S HamiltonDepartment of Preventive Medicine in the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Kevin C WardEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA.
Timothy P HoferVeterans Administration Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Innovation, and Department of Internal Medicine.
Steven J KatzDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health.

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
The Challenge of Individualizing Treatments for Patients with Breast CancerP01CA163233 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOFER, TIMOTHY P. · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003862NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003875NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000034CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA163233NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is growing concern about overtreatment of breast cancer as outcomes have improved over time. However, little is known about how chemotherapy use and oncologists' recommendations have changed in recent years. Methods: We surveyed 5080 women (70% response rate) diagnosed with breast cancer between 2013 and 2015 and accrued through two Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (Georgia and Los Angeles) about chemotherapy receipt and their oncologists' chemotherapy recommendations. We surveyed 504 attending oncologists (60.3% response rate ) about chemotherapy recommendations in node-negative and node-positive case scenarios. We conducted descriptive statistics of chemotherapy use and patients' report of oncologists' recommendations and used a generalized linear mixed model of chemotherapy use according to time and clinical factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The analytic sample was 2926 patients with stage I-II, estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. From 2013 to 2015, keeping other factors constant, chemotherapy use was estimated to decline from 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.8% to 38.3%) to 21.3% (95% CI = 19.0% to 23.7%, P < .001). Estimated decline in chemotherapy use was from 26.6% (95% CI = 23.0% to 30.7%) to 14.1% (95% CI = 12.0% to 16.3%) for node-negative/micrometastasis patients and from 81.1% (95% CI = 76.6% to 85.0%) to 64.2% (95% CI = 58.6% to 69.6%) for node-positive patients. Use of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) did not change among node-negative/micrometastasis patients, and increasing RS use in node-positive patients accounted for one-third of the chemotherapy decline. Patients' report of oncologists' recommendations for chemotherapy declined from 44.9% (95% CI = 40.2% to 49.7%) to 31.6% (95% CI = 25.9% to 37.9%), controlling for other factors. Oncologists were much more likely to order RS if patient preferences were discordant with their recommendations (67.4%, 95% CI = 61.7% to 73.0%, vs 17.5%, 95% CI = 13.1% to 22.0%, concordant), and they adjusted recommendations based on patient preferences and RS results. Conclusions: For both node-negative/micrometastasis and node-positive patients, chemotherapy receipt and oncologists' recommendations for chemotherapy declined markedly over time, without substantial change in practice guidelines. Results of ongoing trials will be essential to confirm the quality of this approach to breast cancer care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOncologistsPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'RegistriesSEER ProgramUnited StatesYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29237009
PMCPMC5946952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.