Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29236966›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2018

Neuronal inhibition and synaptic plasticity of basal ganglia neurons in Parkinson's disease.

Luka Milosevic, Suneil K Kalia, Mojgan Hodaie, Andres M Lozano, Alfonso Fasano, Milos R Popovic, William D Hutchison

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07671261 (Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07671261 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Schizophrenia: Individualized Target Selection and Efficacy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled46ConditionsSchizophrenia Disorders, Schizo Affective DisorderArmsSEEG implantation, Deep brain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The electric brain: approach to suboptimal DBS parameters.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neuroplasticity in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Luka MilosevicInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G9, Canada.
Suneil K KaliaDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada.
Mojgan HodaieDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada.
Andres M LozanoDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada.
Alfonso FasanoKrembil Research Institute, 135 Nassau St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1M8, Canada.
Milos R PopovicInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G9, Canada.
William D HutchisonDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAKrembil Foundation · CAKrembil Research InstituteToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP 98006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease symptoms. The therapeutic benefits of deep brain stimulation are frequency-dependent, but the underlying physiological mechanisms remain unclear. To advance deep brain stimulation therapy an understanding of fundamental mechanisms is critical. The objectives of this study were to (i) compare the frequency-dependent effects on cell firing in subthalamic nucleus and substantia nigra pars reticulata; (ii) quantify frequency-dependent effects on short-term plasticity in substantia nigra pars reticulata; and (iii) investigate effects of continuous long-train high frequency stimulation (comparable to conventional deep brain stimulation) on synaptic plasticity. Two closely spaced (600 µm) microelectrodes were advanced into the subthalamic nucleus (n = 27) and substantia nigra pars reticulata (n = 14) of 22 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease. Cell firing and evoked field potentials were recorded with one microelectrode during stimulation trains from the adjacent microelectrode across a range of frequencies (1-100 Hz, 100 µA, 0.3 ms, 50-60 pulses). Subthalamic firing attenuated with ≥20 Hz (P < 0.01) stimulation (silenced at 100 Hz), while substantia nigra pars reticulata decreased with ≥3 Hz (P < 0.05) (silenced at 50 Hz). Substantia nigra pars reticulata also exhibited a more prominent increase in transient silent period following stimulation. Patients with longer silent periods after 100 Hz stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus tended to have better clinical outcome after deep brain stimulation. At ≥30 Hz the first evoked field potential of the stimulation train in substantia nigra pars reticulata was potentiated (P < 0.05); however, the average amplitude of the subsequent potentials was rapidly attenuated (P < 0.01). This is suggestive of synaptic facilitation followed by rapid depression. Paired pulse ratios calculated at the beginning of the train revealed that 20 Hz (P < 0.05) was the minimum frequency required to induce synaptic depression. Lastly, the average amplitude of evoked field potentials during 1 Hz pulses showed significant inhibitory synaptic potentiation after long-train high frequency stimulation (P < 0.001) and these increases were coupled with increased durations of neuronal inhibition (P < 0.01). The subthalamic nucleus exhibited a higher frequency threshold for stimulation-induced inhibition than the substantia nigra pars reticulata likely due to differing ratios of GABA:glutamate terminals on the soma and/or the nature of their GABAergic inputs (pallidal versus striatal). We suggest that enhancement of inhibitory synaptic plasticity, and frequency-dependent potentiation and depression are putative mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. Furthermore, we foresee that future closed-loop deep brain stimulation systems (with more frequent off stimulation periods) may benefit from inhibitory synaptic potentiation that occurs after high frequency stimulation.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsBasal GangliaBiophysicsElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMicroelectrodesNeural InhibitionNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsParkinson DiseaseSeverity of Illness IndexSubthalamic NucleusTime Factorsclinical neurophysiologydeep brain stimulationneurosurgeryParkinson’s diseasesubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID29236966
PMCPMC5917776
OpenAlexW2773979760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.