Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29236961›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Outlier detection for improved differential splicing quantification from RNA-Seq experiments with replicates.

Scott S Norton, Jorge Vaquero-Garcia, Nicholas F Lahens, Gregory R Grant, Yoseph Barash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HNRNPH1-mediated splicing events regulatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Molecular networks in Network Medicine: Development and applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. RNA sequencing: the teenage years.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott S NortonDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine.
Jorge Vaquero-GarciaDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine.
Nicholas F LahensInstitute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Gregory R GrantDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine.
Yoseph BarashDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine.

Funding

Methods for RNA splicing variations detection, quantification, visualization, and association from large heterogeneous datasetsR01GM128096 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARASH, YOSEPH · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
Modeling Splicing in normal tissues and neurodegenerative diseaseR01AG046544 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARASH, YOSEPH · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046544NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: A key component in many RNA-Seq-based studies is contrasting multiple replicates from different experimental conditions. In this setup, replicates play a key role as they allow to capture underlying biological variability inherent to the compared conditions, as well as experimental variability. However, what constitutes a 'bad' replicate is not necessarily well defined. Consequently, researchers might discard valuable data or downstream analysis may be hampered by failed experiments. Results: Here we develop a probability model to weigh a given RNA-Seq sample as a representative of an experimental condition when performing alternative splicing analysis. We demonstrate that this model detects outlier samples which are consistently and significantly different compared with other samples from the same condition. Moreover, we show that instead of discarding such samples the proposed weighting scheme can be used to downweight samples and specific splicing variations suspected as outliers, gaining statistical power. These weights can then be used for differential splicing (DS) analysis, where the resulting algorithm offers a generalization of the MAJIQ algorithm. Using both synthetic and real-life data, we perform an extensive evaluation of the improved MAJIQ algorithm in different scenarios involving perturbed samples, mislabeled samples, same condition groups, and different levels of coverage, showing it compares favorably to other tools. Overall, this work offers an outlier detection algorithm that can be combined with any splicing pipeline, a generalized and improved version of MAJIQ for DS detection, and evaluation metrics with matching code and data for DS algorithms. Availability and implementation: Software and data are accessible via majiq.biociphers.org/norton_et_al_2017/. Contact: yosephb@upenn.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAlternative SplicingGene Expression ProfilingSequence Analysis, RNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID29236961
PMCPMC6454425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.