Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29236917›Full record

Observational studyClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study.

Sirlei Siani Morais, Mirena Ide, Andrea Moreno Morgan, Fernanda Garanhani Surita

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Factors associated with fetal macrosomia.Revista de saude publica · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sirlei Siani MoraisDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BR.
Mirena IdeDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BR.
Andrea Moreno MorganDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BR.
Fernanda Garanhani SuritaDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo generate a new body mass index curve of reference values and ranges for body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy and to compare the new curve and weight gain ranges with the currently used references.

methodsA prospective observational study was conducted with a total of 5,656 weight and body mass index measurements in 641 women with single pregnancy who attended their first prenatal visit before 12 weeks. All the women were over 18 years old and had no medical conditions that would influence body mass index. Data were collected using prenatal charts and medical records during hospitalization for childbirth. A linear regression method was used for standard curve smoothing in the general population and for specific curves according to the baseline body mass index classification. Curves were obtained for the 5th, 10th, 50th, 85th, 90th and 95th percentiles. Concordance between the classification of women using the newly generated and currently used curves was evaluated by percentages and kappa coefficients. The weight gain was compared with the reference values of the Institute of Medicine using Student's T test. The data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.2, and the significance level was set at 5%.

resultsA general reference curve of percentiles of body mass index by gestational age was established. Additionally, four specific curves were generated according to the four baseline body mass index categories. The new general curve offered percentile limits for women according to their initial body mass index and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limits, showing poor agreement with the currently used curve (48.3%). Women who were overweight or obese when starting prenatal care had higher weight gain than the Institute of Medicine recommendation.

conclusionsThe new proposed curve for body mass index during pregnancy showed weak agreement with the currently used curve. The new curve provided more information regarding body mass index increase using percentiles for general and specific groups of body mass index. Overweight pregnant women showed an upward body mass index trend throughout pregnancy that increased more dramatically than those of other groups of pregnant women, and they also presented a major mean difference between weight gain and the Institute of Medicine recommendation.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexWeight GainAdultFemaleHumansObesityOverweightPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareProspective StudiesReference ValuesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID29236917
PMCPMC5706065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.