Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29236726›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Demographic monitoring of wild muriqui populations: Criteria for defining priority areas and monitoring intensity.

Karen B Strier, Carla B Possamai, Fernanda P Tabacow, Alcides Pissinatti, Andre M Lanna, Fabiano Rodrigues de Melo, Leandro Moreira, Maurício Talebi, Paula Breves, Sérgio L Mendes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The limits of resilience.Primates; journal of primatology · 2021
    Article
  6. Transcriptome of the Southern MuriquiFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen B StrierDepartment of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-9110
Carla B PossamaiMuriqui Instituto de Biodiversidade, Caratinga, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fernanda P TabacowMuriqui Instituto de Biodiversidade, Caratinga, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alcides PissinattiCentro de Primatologia de Rio de Janeiro (CPRJ-INEA), Guapimirim, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andre M LannaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fabiano Rodrigues de MeloMuriqui Instituto de Biodiversidade, Caratinga, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Leandro MoreiraMuriqui Instituto de Biodiversidade, Caratinga, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maurício TalebiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Campus Diadema, Laboratório de Primatologia e Conservação de Espécies, Departamento de Ciências Ambientais & Programa de Pós-Graduação Análise Ambiental Integrada, Diadema São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula BrevesEcoatlântica, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Sérgio L MendesDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Leandro JerusalinskyCentro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Primatas Brasileiros-CPB, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade-ICMBio, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demographic data are essential to assessments of the status of endangered species. However, establishing an integrated monitoring program to obtain useful data on contemporary and future population trends requires both the identification of priority areas and populations and realistic evaluations of the kinds of data that can be obtained under different monitoring regimes. We analyzed all known populations of a critically endangered primate, the muriqui (genus: Brachyteles) using population size, genetic uniqueness, geographic importance (including potential importance in corridor programs) and implementability scores to define monitoring priorities. Our analyses revealed nine priority populations for the northern muriqui (B. hypoxanthus) and nine for the southern muriqui (B. arachnoides). In addition, we employed knowledge of muriqui developmental and life history characteristics to define the minimum monitoring intensity needed to evaluate demographic trends along a continuum ranging from simple descriptive changes in population size to predictions of population changes derived from individual based life histories. Our study, stimulated by the Brazilian government's National Action Plan for the Conservation of Muriquis, is fundamental to meeting the conservation goals for this genus, and also provides a model for defining priorities and methods for the implementation of integrated demographic monitoring programs for other endangered and critically endangered species of primates.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAtelinaeConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsDemography

Identifiers

PMID29236726
PMCPMC5728487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.