ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018
Work Outcomes in Patients Who Stay at Work Despite Musculoskeletal Pain.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cost-utility analysis of pharmacopuncture versus physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: A multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Integrative medicine research · 2025Article
- Navigating work life after colorectal cancer: insights into work ability and functioning - a Danish follow-up study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Occupational low back pain among Japanese caregivers: A large-scale cross-sectional study.Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2024Article
- The potential of a multimodal digital care program in addressing healthcare inequities in musculoskeletal pain management.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Work-related outcomes in individuals with and without lower limb osteoarthritis: an online survey.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Managing Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Through a Digital Care Solution: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- Haemodialysis nurses' occupational health and work-related musculoskeletal hand pain after work: A cluster analysis.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Team Workload and Performance of Healthcare Workers with Musculoskeletal Symptoms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Digital Care Programs for Chronic Hip Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impacts of Digital Care Programs for Musculoskeletal Conditions on Depression and Work Productivity: Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Article
- Telerehabilitation of acute musculoskeletal multi-disorders: prospective, single-arm, interventional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Work-related musculoskeletal complaints among haemodialysis nurses: An exploratory study of the work situation from an ergonomic perspective.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Asynchronous and Tailored Digital Rehabilitation of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Work Ability Index in Health Centre Workers in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Mediational Occupational Risk Factors Pertaining to Work Ability According to Age, Gender and Professional Job Type.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Prognostic Factors for Staying at Work for Partially Sick-Listed Workers with Subjective Health Complaints: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Work productivity loss among rheumatoid arthritis patients in India: a qualitative study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2019Article
- Translation, adaptation and validation of the Nurse-Work Instability Scale to Brazilian Portuguese.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To assess self-reported work impacts and associations between psychosocial risk factors and work impairment amongst workers seeking care for musculoskeletal pain while continuing to work. Methods Patients were recruited from Musculoskeletal Assessment Clinics at 5 hospitals across Ireland. Participants completed questionnaires including assessments of work impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire), work ability (single item from the Work Ability Index) and work performance (Work Role Functioning Questionnaire; WRFQ). Logistic and hierarchical regressions were conducted to analyse the relation between psychosocial variables and work outcomes. Results 155 participants (53.5% female; mean age = 46.50 years) who were working at the time of assessment completed the questionnaires. Absenteeism was low, yet 62.6% were classified as functioning poorly according to the WRFQ; 52.3% reported having poor work ability. Logistic regression analyses indicated that higher work role functioning was associated with higher pain self-efficacy (OR 1.51); better work ability was associated with older age (OR 1.063) and lower functional restriction (OR 0.93); greater absenteeism was associated with lower pain self-efficacy (OR 0.65) and poorer work expectancy (OR 1.18). Multiple regression analysis indicated that greater presenteeism was associated with higher pain intensity (β = 0.259) and lower pain self-efficacy (β = - 0.385). Conclusions While individuals continue to work with musculoskeletal pain, their work performance can be adversely affected. Interventions that target mutable factors, such as pain self-efficacy, may help reduce the likelihood of work impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29236203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.