Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29235732›Full record

ReviewPest management science2018

Weed resistance to synthetic auxin herbicides.

Roberto Busi, Danica E Goggin, Ian M Heap, Michael J Horak, Mithila Jugulam, Robert A Masters, Richard M Napier, Dilpreet S Riar, Norbert M Satchivi, Joel Torra and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pest management science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Lipid Matters: How Herbicidal Ionic Liquids Engage with Membranes.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Creation of new rice germplasm with cross-resistance to auxin herbicides picloram and dicamba by genome editing of OsAFB4.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Roberto BusiAustralian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Danica E GogginAustralian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Ian M HeapInternational Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7960-8921
Michael J HorakMonsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mithila JugulamDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2065-9067
Robert A MastersDow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-4534
Richard M NapierSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Dilpreet S RiarDow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Norbert M SatchiviDow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-741X
Joel TorraDepartment of Horticulture, Botany and Gardening, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Phillip WestraDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Terry R WrightDow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbicides classified as synthetic auxins have been most commonly used to control broadleaf weeds in a variety of crops and in non-cropland areas since the first synthetic auxin herbicide (SAH), 2,4-D, was introduced to the market in the mid-1940s. The incidence of weed species resistant to SAHs is relatively low considering their long-term global application with 30 broadleaf, 5 grass, and 1 grass-like weed species confirmed resistant to date. An understanding of the context and mechanisms of SAH resistance evolution can inform management practices to sustain the longevity and utility of this important class of herbicides. A symposium was convened during the 2nd Global Herbicide Resistance Challenge (May 2017; Denver, CO, USA) to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of SAH resistance mechanisms including case studies of weed species resistant to SAHs and perspectives on mitigating resistance development in SAH-tolerant crops. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

Herbicide ResistanceHerbicidesIndoleacetic AcidsPlant WeedsWeed ControlHerbicidesIndoleacetic Acidsherbicide resistanceherbicide resistance mitigationherbicide-tolerant cropsresistance mechanismssynthetic auxin herbicides

Identifiers

PMID29235732
PMCPMC6175398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.