Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29235571›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2018

The hypoxia marker CAIX is prognostic in the UK phase III VorteX-Biobank cohort: an important resource for translational research in soft tissue sarcoma.

Laura Forker, Piers Gaunt, Stefano Sioletic, Patrick Shenjere, Robert Potter, Darren Roberts, Joely Irlam, Helen Valentine, David Hughes, Ana Hughes and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeting hypoxia in solid and haematological malignancies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura ForkerTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Piers GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Stefano SioleticDepartment of Pathology, Ospedale S.Camillo de Lellis, Rieti 02100, Italy.
Patrick ShenjereDepartment of Histopathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Robert PotterTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Darren RobertsTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Joely IrlamTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Helen ValentineTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
David HughesDepartment of Histopathology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Weston Park Hospital, Whitham Road, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK.
Ana HughesCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Lucinda BillinghamCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Rob GrimerDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
Beatrice SeddonDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 1st Floor Central, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK.
Ananya ChoudhuryTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Martin RobinsonDepartment of Oncology, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology (Cancer Clinical Trials Centre), Weston Park Hospital, Whitham Road, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK.
Catharine M L WestTranslational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBOspedale generale di zona San Camillo Treviso · ITRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15958Cancer Research UK 6786Cancer Research UK C1094/A6786Cancer Research UK C1467/A15578Cancer Research UK CRUK/05/003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite high metastasis rates, adjuvant/neoadjuvant systemic therapy for localised soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is not used routinely. Progress requires tailoring therapy to features of tumour biology, which need exploration in well-documented cohorts. Hypoxia has been linked to metastasis in STS and is targetable. This study evaluated hypoxia prognostic markers in the phase III adjuvant radiotherapy VorteX trial.

methodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour biopsies, fresh tumour/normal tissue and blood were collected before radiotherapy. Immunohistochemistry for HIF-1α, CAIX and GLUT1 was performed on tissue microarrays and assessed by two scorers (one pathologist). Prognostic analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.

resultsBiobank and outcome data were available for 203 out of 216 randomised patients. High CAIX expression was associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.44-3.59, P<0.001). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and GLUT1 were not prognostic. Carbonic anhydrase IX remained prognostic in multivariable analysis.

conclusionsThe VorteX-Biobank contains tissue with linked outcome data and is an important resource for research. This study confirms hypoxia is linked to poor prognosis in STS and suggests that CAIX may be the best known marker. However, overlap between single marker positivity was poor and future work will develop an STS hypoxia gene signature to account for tumour heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Up-RegulationAgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiological Specimen BanksBiomarkers, TumorCarbonic Anhydrase IXCell HypoxiaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlucose Transporter Type 1HumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA9 protein, humanCarbonic Anhydrase IXGlucose Transporter Type 1HIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitSLC2A1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29235571
PMCPMC5846059
OpenAlexW2766910036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.