Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29235213›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2018

Models meet data: Challenges and opportunities in implementing land management in Earth system models.

Julia Pongratz, Han Dolman, Axel Don, Karl-Heinz Erb, Richard Fuchs, Martin Herold, Chris Jones, Tobias Kuemmerle, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Patrick Meyfroidt and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Greening of human-dominated ecosystems in India.Communications earth & environment · 2023
    Article
  6. Using the atmospheric COGlobal change biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia PongratzMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0372-3960
Han DolmanDepartment of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0099-0457
Axel DonThünen-Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-3332
Karl-Heinz ErbInstitute of Social Ecology Vienna (SEC), Alpen-Adria Universitaet Klagenfurt Wien, Graz, Vienna, Austria.
Richard FuchsGeography Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3830-1274
Martin HeroldLaboratory of Geoinformation Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Chris JonesMet Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.
Tobias KuemmerleGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastiaan LuyssaertDepartment of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1121-1869
Patrick MeyfroidtGeorges Lemaître Center for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain & F.R.S.-FNRS, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Kim NaudtsMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the applications of Earth system models (ESMs) move from general climate projections toward questions of mitigation and adaptation, the inclusion of land management practices in these models becomes crucial. We carried out a survey among modeling groups to show an evolution from models able only to deal with land-cover change to more sophisticated approaches that allow also for the partial integration of land management changes. For the longer term a comprehensive land management representation can be anticipated for all major models. To guide the prioritization of implementation, we evaluate ten land management practices-forestry harvest, tree species selection, grazing and mowing harvest, crop harvest, crop species selection, irrigation, wetland drainage, fertilization, tillage, and fire-for (1) their importance on the Earth system, (2) the possibility of implementing them in state-of-the-art ESMs, and (3) availability of required input data. Matching these criteria, we identify "low-hanging fruits" for the inclusion in ESMs, such as basic implementations of crop and forestry harvest and fertilization. We also identify research requirements for specific communities to address the remaining land management practices. Data availability severely hampers modeling the most extensive land management practice, grazing and mowing harvest, and is a limiting factor for a comprehensive implementation of most other practices. Inadequate process understanding hampers even a basic assessment of crop species selection and tillage effects. The need for multiple advanced model structures will be the challenge for a comprehensive implementation of most practices but considerable synergy can be gained using the same structures for different practices. A continuous and closer collaboration of the modeling, Earth observation, and land system science communities is thus required to achieve the inclusion of land management in ESMs.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEarth, PlanetEcosystemModels, TheoreticalConservation of Natural ResourcesclimatecroplandsEarth observationsEarth system modelsforestrygrazingland managementland use

Identifiers

PMID29235213
PMCPMC6446815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.