ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018
Quantitative Peptidomics with Five-plex Reductive Methylation labels.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexual Dimorphism and Intraspecific Toxin Variation in Crotalus durissus terrificus Venom: Insights from Proteomics, Peptidomics, and Structural Modeling.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Decoding Neuropeptide Complexity: Advancing Neurobiological Insights from Invertebrates to Vertebrates through Evolutionary Perspectives.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Review
- Quantitative Peptidomics: General Considerations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Quantitative Peptidomics Using Reductive Methylation of Amines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Label-Free Quantitation of Endogenous Peptides.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Recent advances in mass spectrometry analysis of neuropeptides.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2023Review
- Advancements in Oncoproteomics Technologies: Treading toward Translation into Clinical Practice.Proteomes · 2023Review
- Mice heterozygous for a null mutation of CPE show reduced expression of carboxypeptidase e mRNA and enzyme activity but normal physiology, behavior, and levels of neuropeptides.Brain research · 2022Article
- Multiplexed quantitative neuropeptidomics via DiLeu isobaric tagging.Methods in enzymology · 2022Article
- Developing mass spectrometry for the quantitative analysis of neuropeptides.Expert review of proteomics · 2021Review
- Neuropeptidomic Analysis of a Genetically Defined Cell Type in Mouse Brain and Pituitary.Cell chemical biology · 2021Article
- Comparative gender peptidomics ofThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Temporal Study of the Perturbation of Crustacean Neuropeptides Due to Severe Hypoxia Using 4-Plex Reductive Dimethylation.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- The Relevance of Thimet Oligopeptidase in the Regulation of Energy Metabolism and Diet-Induced Obesity.Biomolecules · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative peptidomics and proteomics often use chemical tags to covalently modify peptides with reagents that differ in the number of stable isotopes, allowing for quantitation of the relative peptide levels in the original sample based on the peak height of each isotopic form. Different chemical reagents have been used as tags for quantitative peptidomics and proteomics, and all have strengths and weaknesses. One of the simplest approaches uses formaldehyde and sodium cyanoborohydride to methylate amines, converting primary and secondary amines into tertiary amines. Up to five different isotopic forms can be generated, depending on the isotopic forms of formaldehyde and cyanoborohydride reagents, allowing for five-plex quantitation. However, the mass difference between each of these forms is only 1 Da per methyl group incorporated into the peptide, and for many peptides there is substantial overlap from the natural abundance of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.