Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29235007›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2018

Snapshot Study on the Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer.

Robin D Blok, Gijsbert D Musters, Wernard A A Borstlap, Christianne J Buskens, Wilhelmus A Bemelman, Pieter J Tanis, Collaborative Dutch Snapshot Research Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Efficacy of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure After Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Further insights into the treatment of perineal hernia based on a the experience of a single tertiary centre.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020
    Article
  16. PERINEAL REPAIR AFTER ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION WITH RECTUS ABDOMINIS MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin D BlokDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gijsbert D MustersDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wernard A A BorstlapDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christianne J BuskensDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmus A BemelmanDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. P.J.Tanis@amc.nl.
Collaborative Dutch Snapshot Research Group
University of Amsterdam · NLAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding UVA 2015-7762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerineal wound complications are often encountered following abdominoperineal resection (APR). Filling of the pelvic space by omentoplasty (OP) might prevent these complications, but there is scant evidence to support its routine application.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of OP on perineal wound complications.

methodsAll patients undergoing APR with primary perineal closure (PPC) for non-locally advanced rectal cancer in 71 Dutch centers in 2011 were selected from a cross-sectional snapshot study. Outcomes were compared between PPC with or without OP, which was based on variability in practice among surgeons.

resultsOf 639 patients who underwent APR for rectal cancer, 477 had a non-locally advanced tumor and PPC was performed. Of those, 172 (36%) underwent OP. Patients with OP statistically more often underwent an extralevator approach (32% vs. 14%). Median follow-up was 41 months (interquartile range 22-47). There were no significant differences with or without OP in terms of non-healing of the perineal wound at 30 days (47% vs. 48%), non-healing at the end of follow-up (9% vs. 5%), pelvic abscess (12% vs. 13%) or re-intervention for ileus (5% vs. 3%). Perineal hernia developed significantly more often after OP (13% vs. 7%), also by multivariable analysis (odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.271-5.364; p = 0.009).

conclusionsIn contrast to previous assumptions, OP after APR with PPC appeared not to improve perineal wound healing and seemed to increase the occurrence of perineal hernia. These findings question the routine use of OP for primary filling of the pelvic space.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAbdomenAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOmentumPerineumPostoperative ComplicationsProctectomyPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound Dehiscence

Identifiers

PMID29235007
PMCPMC5814519
OpenAlexW2771352487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.