Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2018
Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05707338 (Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer :a Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- The Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: initial Egyptian experience at the National Cancer Institute.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2020Trial
- Article
- Risk factors as criteria for drain use in gastrectomy: A prospective study.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of KLASS-02 and CLASS-01 randomized controlled trials.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: Could the robotic approach provide any benefits than laparoscopy?World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Role of Robotic Surgery Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review by the Robotic Global Surgical Society (TROGSS) and European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery (EFISDS) Joint Working Group.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Current clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery in China.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- The inflammation score predicts the prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing Da Vinci robot surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- An international Delphi consensus for surgical quality assessment of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis in minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matched analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Reliability and validity analyses of the postoperative comfort scale for patients with lung cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery and an evaluation of patient comfort.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) has gained acceptance as one of the best treatments for early gastric cancer. However, the application of LAG with D2 lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial.
methodsWe launched a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally AGC to evaluate technical safety and oncologic feasibility. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were based on the modified intention-to-treat analysis.
resultsBetween January 2010 and June 2012, a total of 328 patients with preoperative clinical stage T
conclusionsThe short-term results of the current study suggest that LAG with D2 lymph node dissection is a safe and feasible procedure in treating patients with locally AGC in experienced centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.