Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234914›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Discriminating MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with glioblastoma employing amide proton transfer-weighted MRI metrics.

Shanshan Jiang, Qihong Rui, Yu Wang, Hye-Young Heo, Tianyu Zou, Hao Yu, Yi Zhang, Xianlong Wang, Yongxing Du, Xinrui Wen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinically Relevant Imaging Features forAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mitigation of TRadiology advances · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shanshan JiangDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China. sjiang21@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2853-9991
Qihong RuiDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hye-Young HeoDivision of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Tianyu ZouDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Hao YuDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Yi ZhangDivision of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Xianlong WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Yongxing DuDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Xinrui WenDepartment of Neurology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fangyao ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jihong WangDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Charles G EberhartDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jinyuan ZhouDivision of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Zhibo WenDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China. zhibowen@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0497-0923
Zhujiang Hospital · CNJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Amide Proton Transfer (APT) MRI of Brain Tumors at 3T and 7TR01EB009731 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2009 to 2016
$2.9M
Academic-Industrial Partnership to Develop Clinical Brain Cancer ImagingR01CA166171 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM, ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
National Cancer Institute R01CA166171National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering R01EB009731National Natural Science Foundation of China 81171322NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166171NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the feasibility of using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI metrics as surrogate biomarkers to identify the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in glioblastoma (GBM).

methodsEighteen newly diagnosed GBM patients, who were previously scanned at 3T and had a confirmed MGMT methylation status, were retrospectively analysed. For each case, a histogram analysis in the tumour mass was performed to evaluate several quantitative APTw MRI metrics. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the difference in APTw parameters between MGMT methylated and unmethylated GBMs, and the receiver-operator-characteristic analysis was further used to assess diagnostic performance.

resultsTen GBMs were found to harbour a methylated MGMT promoter, and eight GBMs were unmethylated. The mean, variance, 50th percentile, 90th percentile and Width

conclusionsAPTw signal metrics have the potential to serve as valuable imaging biomarkers for identifying MGMT methylation status in the GBM population. KEY POINTS: • APTw-MRI is applied to predict MGMT promoter methylation status in GBMs. • GBMs with unmethylated MGMT promoter present higher APTw-MRI than methylated GBMs. • Multiple APTw histogram metrics can identify MGMT methylation status. • Mean APTw values showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.825).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmidesBiomarkersBrainBrain NeoplasmsDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPromoter Regions, GeneticAmidesBiomarkersDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanProtonsTumor Suppressor ProteinsAmide proton transfer-weighted imagingGlioblastomaMagnetic resonance imagingMethylationO6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID29234914
PMCPMC5884703
OpenAlexW2774805823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.